Sentences with phrase «greenhouse effect theory»

If that is not enough to kill off the CO2 greenhouse effect theory forever, it should be.

Formal Presentation by Zagoni: Ferenc Miskolczi's Saturated Greenhouse Effect Theory.

The CO2 Enhanced Greenhouse Effect Theory is totally irrelevant to the Global Warming phenomenon.

In Sections 4 - 6, we will explain how our research shows that this more complicated greenhouse effect theory is also wrong.

The mystery of the missing hot spot is solved by the Miskolczi greenhouse effect theory and confirmed by the declining relative humidity, especially at the altitude of the predicted hot spot.

But, the greenhouse effect theory is very poorly explained, with lots of different & contradictory versions flying around.

According to the greenhouse effect theory, water vapour is a more important greenhouse gas than CO2.

So, either there is a greenhouse effect... or there are problems with the greenhouse effect theory.

This theory became known as the «greenhouse effect theory», and the infrared - active gases became known as «greenhouse gases».

The greenhouse effect theory relies on the assumption that radiative processes can alter the thermal energy profile of the atmosphere, e.g., heat the troposphere and cool the stratosphere.

As I discussed above in the Greenhouse effect theory: «It's simple physics» version and Greenhouse effect theory: The version used by climate models sections, there are several different definitions of «the greenhouse effect».

Clearly, if the greenhouse effect theory is wrong, then man - made global warming theory is also wrong.

Indeed, it was derived before the greenhouse effect theory was proposed.

In the «simple physics» version of the greenhouse effect theory, infrared - active gases are supposed to «trap» heat in the atmosphere, because they can absorb infrared light.

In Section 3, we explained that a fundamental assumption of the greenhouse effect theory is that the atmosphere is only in local energy equilibrium.

As we saw in Section 3, the greenhouse effect theory predicts that infrared - active gases lead to complicated infrared cooling rates which should be different at each height (e.g., the one in Figure 9).

The greenhouse effect theory explicitly assumes that the atmosphere is only in local energy equilibrium.

Remarkably, nobody seems to have actually checked experimentally to see if the greenhouse effect theory was correct.

But, personally, if I was promoting the greenhouse effect theory, I'd avoid relying on appeals to antiquity.

It also disproves the man - made global warming theory, which is based on the greenhouse effect theory.

According to the greenhouse effect theory, «if there is no greenhouse effect, then the surface temperature would be the non-greenhouse temperature (255 K)».

The greenhouse effect theory explicitly relies on the assumption that the atmosphere is in local energy equilibrium, yet until we carried out our research, nobody seems to have actually experimentally tested if that assumption was valid.

This disproves the greenhouse effect theory.

Therefore, in order to check if man - made global warming theory is valid, it is important to check whether or not the greenhouse effect theory is valid.

It is true that the greenhouse effect theory is based on experimental observations, e.g., a) the different infra - red properties of the atmospheric gases; b) the infra - red nature of the Earth's outgoing radiation and c) the observation that fossil fuel usage is increasing the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

It's quite technical, and might require careful reading, but it is fairly short and I think provides one of the better summaries of the details of the greenhouse effect theory.

The greenhouse effect theory explicitly relies on the assumption that the air is only in local energy equilibrium.

This directly contradicts the greenhouse effect theory, which predicts that carbon dioxide should increase the temperature in the lower atmosphere (the «troposphere»), and decrease the temperature in the middle atmosphere (the «stratosphere»).

In other words, the experimental data shows that one of the key assumptions of the greenhouse effect theory is wrong, and two of its predictions are false.

We think the conflict arises because the greenhouse effect theory explicitly assumes that the atmosphere is only in local thermodynamic equilibrium (what we refer to as «local energy equilibrium» in the above essay).

This mechanism is not considered in the greenhouse effect theory, or in the current climate models.

In other words, it can explain why the greenhouse effect theory is wrong!

However, if the atmosphere is only in LTE, then CO2 could theoretically lead to the radiative «energy imbalances» predicted by the Greenhouse Effect theory.

As we will see later, the greenhouse effect theory fundamentally requires that the atmosphere is only in local energy equilibrium.

So, we wondered what physical predictions the greenhouse effect theory implied, which could be tested... now!

I appreciate that it is a concept that is inadequately discussed, and many people don't realise how intrinsic the assumption is to the greenhouse effect theory.

If the greenhouse effect theory were true then increasing the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere should increase the average temperature in the troposphere, because carbon dioxide is an infrared - active gas.

When we first started studying the greenhouse effect theory in detail, one of the trickiest things to figure out was exactly what the theory was supposed to be.