Sentences with phrase «net immigration»

Otherwise, there is nobody arguing against the need to reduce net immigration.

It merely speaks of lowering the rate of net immigration to the united states.

I'd still stick with a baseline year for per - capita allocations, don't adjust for population growth / decline, do adjust for net immigration.

David Cameron's travails over his response to Ukip's surge has worsened after mayor of London, Boris Johnson, described the Tory manifesto pledge to cut net immigration numbers to below 100,000 as a «great deception».

A government is bound to have regard to its levels of projected population growth, the number of new houses it needs to build at what speed, the number of new schools and health centres it needs to open etc. in order to cope with rising demand — and to aim to relate net immigration levels to its capabilities.

Theresa May and her cabinet hold fast to a commitment to reduce net immigration numbers and, in an effort to make the approach more politically palatable, present a rigid dichotomy between the dishonest, criminal, «illegal» migrant (a category which usually includes asylum seekers), and the hard working, tax - paying, rule - observing migrant.

Since its inception the PBS has proved to be flexible in the sense that it can be used by the government of the day to implement changes to policies at short notice with the aim of managing net immigration.

Mr Green is quoted in that story saying: «This rips apart the Government's previous complacent assumptions about net immigration.»

Many of the counties with the highest net immigration relative to their 2016 population come as no surprise — counties in and around the big cities in the Northeast, in South Florida, and along the Texas border all saw a large amount of population growth from immigration.

According to the author on the basis of the parties current policies Labour would reduce net immigration by about 8 % and the Conservatives would reduce it by 27 %.

The House will see that the vast majority of net immigration comes from outside the European Union.

Figures from Capital Economics indicate net immigration to Britain was 400,000 in 2005, more than double the official number of 185,000.

In all, it remains to be seen whether the PBS will ultimately be successful in controlling net immigration and addressing the needs of the UK to attract and retain the brightest talent in an increasingly competitive global market.

NET MIGRATION LEVELS In the eighties and nineties under Conservative Government net immigration never rose above 77,000 a year.

But he reserved his strongest words for a pledge to go far further in cutting annual net immigration.»

Fully 78 % support David Cameron's election pledge to reduce net immigration into Britain from hundreds of thousands a year to «tens of thousands».

Even if net immigration ended tomorrow, continuation of that fertility rate would guarantee further growth in U.S. population for decades to come.

Yet, he said, the UK still experienced net immigration of some 460,000 people in that year.

Projections are from the «middle series» published by Census and are based on the middle assumptions for future fertility, life expectancy, and net immigration levels as of July 1 of each year.

Although there is no doubt that this will have an impact on managing net immigration, given that these categories amount to the majority of applications under the PBS, the impact of closing these categories, should not be underestimated.

Continue reading «How can Theresa May persuade voters that net immigration really has been cut by a third?»»

What could tip the balance is that May herself is an immigration sceptic: as home secretary she was said to be the only member of David Cameron's cabinet who agreed with him on cutting net immigration to less than 100,000 a year.

Headlines suggesting 29 million might come here are overblown, but even a few tens of thousands more Romanian or Bulgarian immigrants could throw the government well off course from its ambition to reduce net immigration to under 100,000 by 2015.

Net immigration to the U.K. has averaged some 285,000 people a year over the past three years, adding 0.4 % to the population every year.

We have argued that the Japan experience is unique and that the U.S. has many characteristics (e.g., size, diversity, population growth, net immigration, natural resources) that militate against such an outcome.

Why did the government decide to work hard on reducing the net immigration instead of, e.g., funding NHS?

«The oil tanker has turned around» Immigration figures released today showed that the government was finally beginning to reduce net migration to the UK, leading Green to restate his goal of cutting net immigration to the tens of thousands by 2015.

Official estimates indicated that net immigration to the UK had fallen by a quarter over the past year.

Capital estimates there will be net immigration of 410,000 in 2006, but this will fall to just 200,000 over the four years to 2010.

Official estimates indicated that net immigration to the UK had fallen by a quarter over the past...

He pointed out that net immigration was rising because fewer people were emigrating and because of the free movement of people across the EU.

It follows falls in both gross and net immigration; a drop in the crime figures - despite the spending scaleback - and the (admittedly shaky) introduction of police commissioners.

Mr Gove and Mr Johnson, as well as Labour MP and Vote Leave co-chair Gisela Stuart, wrote: «Voters were promised repeatedly at elections that net immigration could be cut to the tens of thousands.

Compared to a policy of zero net immigration, high immigration (at 140,000 per annum) saw our emissions increase by an additional 16 per cent or 65 million tonnes by 2020.

Texas is a good state to invest in not because of lack of state tax, but because it has net immigration, diversification of its economy away from oil & gas, property price recovery from the 1980s S&L crisis (mostly DFW and Houston), relocation of corporate headquarters to Texas, and low overall cost of state government.