"Religious texts" refer to written or sacred writings that are important in various religions. These texts contain teachings, stories, moral guidelines, and instructions that followers of a particular religion believe are divinely inspired or reveal spiritual truths. Examples include the Bible in Christianity, Quran in Islam, and Vedas in Hinduism.
Full definition
All the quoting
of religious text in all their forms means absolutely NOTHING as long as people continue to act like animals.
And, in answer to some of your questions out there, this isn't a religious book but shows you specific passages
in religious texts on financial matters.
I have read many
religious texts on the major and some minor religions How many books have you read that cast doubt on the existence of god?
Either way, religion has zero answers to those questions, since
most religious texts are from a time where people thought that our planet was the center of the entire cosmos.
Now would you dare publish one similar article on any other
religious text so we can have a «healthy» discussion about it?
There is no influence from their imaginary gods, so what is left but biased views based upon
religious texts if that is what they actually base them on?
You can't fail to be impressed by a game that not only has a distinctive visual style, but one that also finds its inspiration in
old religious texts to boot.
A very ample tradition exists here as well, especially
because religious texts have been fair game for literary analysis for a long time.
Figures because studies suggest we atheists have a better understanding of
religious texts then the religious.
To all those who judge people who
follow religious texts — would you judge people who follow other forms of poetry?
The same can be said for
other religious texts, but my point is that faith should never be more important than reason.
Most religious texts can be twisted and interpreted to serve any point of view, support any bigotry or tolerant view.
Rather, they discuss small portions
of religious texts with an eye toward discovering how these texts apply to their personal lives.
This question is focused more on the historic aspect, and thus, relying on the chronology given
by religious texts seems a bit inappropriate.
While I personally think that none of the various
religious texts contain a direct message from a God or Gods as they claim to do what almost all of them do contain are moral codes meant to help in the establishment of harmonious communities of individuals.
In light of my series this past week about the Bible, in which I said that the Bible is the most
violent religious text in the world, someone sent this picture to me.
There might be a Buddhist monk who has been in solitary meditation for 30 years who might know but nobody that takes
religious texts at literal face value has any idea.
However... and believe me, I have not use for organized religion... but when you
study religious texts as I have... was this what Jesus taught his followers in the New Testament (which abrugates the Old)??
This invention led to the capacity to produce written
religious texts which then, along with the gods and their utterances, became objects of religious reflection.
But as President of the United States, and as a world leader, he dares not utilize
religious texts for pluralistic secular solutions.
She may not have been indoctrinated / brainwashed by someone within her household, but she didn't form these beliefs about Christianity in a vacuum where no one around her was attempting to convince her to believe, and she was just studying
various religious texts until she happened on the bible and other apologetics.
Anyone who is facinated by his work, or Tolkien's should look into the writings of another one of the Inklings, Charles Williams, who
wrote religious texts, poetry, and fiction, including the novels WAR IN HEAVEN, ALL HALLOW»S EVE, and MANY DIMENSIONS.
The church contains a library filled
with religious texts in the connected monastery, but a main interest of the church is below the building itself.
A fair amount of this work revolved around
reading religious texts, memoirs, and historical accounts of 17th - century Hindustan.
Seriously, god botherers and their a la carte approach to their
own religious texts give me a headache.
You need to get your facts strait, folks who left organized religions know more
about religious texts or concepts much more then those who claim to know them, do you know how similar each religion is to each other?
So, what does this mean for Catholics, Mormons, Muslims, Orthodox Jews, and so many more who believe that their authoritative
religious texts teach something the prevailing culture finds so unacceptable that they are no longer welcome within the mainstream context, even if they are (as Louie Giglio is known for) working to eradicate slavery?
Grasping the literary dimensions of these writings enables students to see what kinds of questions readers can expect
such religious texts to answer, and which they can not answer.
What we should do is a) stop pitting religions against religions (if you're a Christian who hates Islam, then you are 10000 % a hypocrite and a fool and you're not even a Christian because you clearly missed the message of Jesus), and b) we need to stop
taking religious text as literal truth.
I did turn to
religious texts first, when I was trying to find words to use in the choral parts of the score.
Jain
religious texts offer some of the earliest refutations of an omnipotent, monotheistic God responsible for the creation or governance of the world.
Phrases with «religious texts»