They found that to
better understand climate change and its impacts, scientists need to adopt an integrated approach into how coasts are changing.
Why not jail scientists who do
n't understand climate science but want to jail politicians who want all the facts before making a decision.
Among those
who understand the climate science best, there is a creeping resignation that we won't make the hard choices necessary to halt catastrophic global warming.
Climate models, also known as general circulation models of the climate system, are used to investigate and
understand climate variability and change.
It is also increasingly clear that interaction between physical, chemical, and biological components are critical not only for
understanding climate impacts but also for understanding feedbacks in the system.
Critics of the report argue that the market dictates worth and we still don't quite
understand climate sensitivity to increases in CO2 concentrations.
You finish by saying that you don't believe that we can
understand climate why you lack belief that science can be used to study climate.
For example, climate change skeptics jump from the realization that we do not
completely understand all climate - related variables to the inference that we have no reliable knowledge at all.
Other attempts at dismissing awkward facts received less attention, because they're only discussed among those
who understand climate change.
I think the focus should be
on understanding climate — and unfortunately you can't do that without a theory that predicts substantial warming due to anthropogenic CO2.