Unfortunately, the standard fundamentalist chain of logic, translated into BASIC 2.0, is: 10 PRINT «THE BIBLE IS TRUE BECAUSE...» 20 GOTO 10 (religion.blogs.cnn.com)
This allows the appropriate cost benefit analysis (maybe this is getting to far into politics) that should be significantly more useful for the main debate than these temperature predictions that we have and takes many unpredictable factors out of the equation and if we have a full chain of logic it should be easier to find — because time as opposed to amount of carbon related models leave you asking questions like «what will happen to technology» (realclimate.org)