On further appeal, the Supreme Court of Canada found that s. 117 existed for the legitimate, constitutional purpose of criminalizing the smuggling of people into Canada in the context of organized crime, but that it was worded in an overbroad manner, and therefore contrary to s. 7. (chartercases.com)
Appulonappa is a good example of how broadly - worded legislation affecting life, liberty, or security of the person must be confined to a legitimate constitutional purpose. (chartercases.com)