(4) For the purposes of subsection (3)(b), a change in the proposed effective date of the rule does not substantively alter the effect of the rule if the new effective date is a later date than that originally proposed. (bclaws.ca)
But that call for a review was significantly weaker than an earlier draft, seen by Reuters, that requested a 180 - day delay in the scheduled April 10 effective date of the rule, which is already on the books. (fortune.com)
Due to a White House Memorandum to federal agencies released on January 20, 2017, requesting a regulatory freeze on rules recently published or pending, the effective date of the rule was delayed to May 19, 2017. (gourmetnews.com)