The appellant, the Superintendent of Bankruptcy (the «Superintendent»), argues that the doctrine of federal paramountcy renders s. 22 (4) inoperative with respect to a discharged bankrupt for two reasons. (slaw.ca)
They could challenge the constitutionality of Quebec's law and invoke federal paramountcy. (slaw.ca)
Recently, the Ontario Court of Appeal in Canada Post Corporation v Hamilton (City)[1] had an opportunity to revisit the doctrine of federal paramountcy in the context of the most exciting of subjects: community mailboxes. (ruleoflaw.ca)