This multi-tude of fictional beings shows the silliness of the argument. (religion.blogs.cnn.com)
First, that you presume that what homer wrote as well as older manuscripts dating back to ancient greece about zeus was supposed to be fictional is downright silly and culturally chauvinistic. (religion.blogs.cnn.com)
Even if someone named Jesus with some sort of causal connection to the Jesus in the gospels existed, if you just blandly say that Jesus really existed, you sound like you are confirming the largely fictional being of the gospels rather than someone who stands oin some real but in many ways indirect, even tenuous relationship to this fictional character. (religion.blogs.cnn.com)