How did a deeply flawed paper, which contradicts mainstream science on climate change, pass peer review? (retractionwatch.com)
At this point, you may be wondering how such a tremendously flawed paper made it through the peer review process. (skepticalscience.com)
There may also be flawed papers agreeing with the mainstream view, but they have little effect on the gap of perception between the public perception and the scientific consensus. (link.springer.com)