Of course, this arbitral decision was appealed as well, with Justice Abrioux finding that Mr. Ghikas erred in his finding that issue estoppel did not apply to the question before him. (thelitigator.ca)
Ian Roland and Michael Fenrick represented the Canadian Police Association before the Supreme Court of Canada in Penner v. Niagara Police Services Board, a case which raises the application of the doctrine of issue estoppel in the context of police discipline. (paliareroland.com)
[155] The approach of previous decisions on this issue have focused on issue estoppel (Petrelli v. Lindell Beach Holiday Resort Ltd. 2011 BCCA 367 at para. 63; citing Danyluk v. Ainsworth Technologies Inc., 2001 SCC 44 at para. 25). (bc-injury-law.com)