so you can sarcastically dismiss the IPCC as «the holy writ», but it is incumbent on john quiggin to address each and every argument mcintyre makes on the merits? (johnquiggin.com)
prior history of making phony statements Its not proof of course, just a speculation, kinda like Mann speculating that Steve mcIntyre had something to do with the leak. (planet3.org)
So, I got virtually NONE of the story by talking to mcintyre. (climateaudit.org)