I would like to test this in regard to the Forest 2006 paper, by running the IDL code with the errors corrected, in time to put on record in my «expert reviewer» comments on Chapter 10 of the Second Order Draft of IPCC AR5 WG1 report what the differences in Forest 2006's results resulting from correcting these errors are, if significant. (climateaudit.org)
Later in 2005, the first order draft which was looked at by the TSU must now become available to external reviewers. (realclimate.org)