The Manitoba Court of Appeal has held that a defendants» motion for summary judgment should be dismissed, rejecting their argument that claims for pure economic loss for patent defects that are not imminently dangerous should not proceed to trial. (theallgrouponlinejournal.com)
Justice Gleeson saw the claim for costs of raising and maintaining the child as a claim for a novel form of pure economic loss arising because a parent - child relationship had come into existence [26]- [27]. (sydneyhealthlaw.com)
«I don't suggest expanding the scope of tort law (ie — compensation to victims struck by lightening, or compensation for pure economic loss etc.) I simply suggest that those who the law says ought to be compensated actually be compensated.» (slaw.ca)