Gleeson CJ pointed out that the key purpose of the provision of the NTA is to avoid racial discrimination... [62] (humanrights.gov.au)
«Faced with a difficult point of statutory interpretation and conflicting judicial authority, the Tribunal adopted a dictionary meaning of «expenses» and articulated what it considered to be a beneficial policy outcome rather than engage in an interpretative process taking account of the text, context and purpose of the provisions in issue.» (canadianlawyermag.com)
The primary purpose of this provision is to prevent the unintentional lapse of your policy. (irs.com)