Someone points out that instead of putting in supposed temperature related data if you put in randomly generated data series you STILL almost always get a hockey stick graph as output. (climateaudit.org)
In your book, you talk about the importance of the general public being able to understand climate change, and how the hockey stick graph allows for this. (dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com)
I ask again, as no one has yet admitted, is the hockey stick graph wrong or worse a fraud? (desmogblog.com)