They agreed that the judge had carefully considered the parties» contributions and the amount of wealth generated by the husband, and that he had concluded that there was not such a disparity that it would be inequitable to disregard the husband's contribution. (newlawjournal.co.uk)
It was submitted by the husband that if Holman J had followed the above approach, and given proper weight to the quantum of wealth generated by the husband by first considering quantum alone, he would have decided that the husband had made a special contribution. (newlawjournal.co.uk)
In a way, this is a redistribution of wealth generated in favour of the poor and the impoverished. (indianexpress.com)