UPDATE: NOON 8/21 — One emendation, regular reader Steve pointed out one bit of sloppiness in the above post. (alephblog.com)
Both of our CBs show some kind of sloppiness in recent weeks. (sbnation.com)
«It is a misrepresentation to equate slow peer review with thoroughness or rigor, or to use timely peer review as a justification for sloppiness in manuscript preparation.» (sciencemag.org)