Sentences with phrase «'s evil with»

The Amalekites, Moabites, and all the other «ites» were evil with a history of them attacking and keeping the chosen from the land of milk and honey.

As very clearly stated in the Bible (Job, for example), SATAN can only work his evil with the PERMISSION OF and SUPERVISION of GOD.

(53) Twice will they be given their reward, for that they have persevered, that they avert Evil with Good, and that they spend (in charity) out of what We have given them.

You can't overcome evil with evil.

Nor should the church delay implementing Jesus» nonviolent method of overcoming evil with good until the Caesars and Hitlers disappear.

Don't repay evil with evil... pray brothers and sisters for peace.

«Our front lines are the mosques from where we repel this evil with good words meant to serve humanity,» said Salam al - Marayati, president of the Muslim Public Affairs Council.

You can overcome evil with good, because the cross overcame all of your evil and now gives you the power to do good.

The goal isn't to balance evil and good, but rather to overcome evil with good and connect every human being to God through love.

But I try my best to be calm and fight this evil with a scriptural response.

It's more of a conflict between good & evil with good being the aggressor.

Jesus said that, in order to follow him, to combat evil with good and serve others, quoting you, we must take up our own crosses.

God rewards goodness with a long and happy life and punishes evil with misfortune and suffering.

Being chaste, married one time and that is it, or if divorced: being single chaste and serving others, comabting evil with good, sharing what we have with our neighbors without wanting anything in return.

... If the cross is a personal act of violence perpetrated by God towards humankind but borne by His Son, then it makes a mockery of Jesus» own teaching to love your enemies and refuse to repay evil with evil (p. 182f).

Paul bids us overcome evil with good, and this, too, is the imagery of contest.

Face violence with compassion, evil with love, and the violence of history will come undone.

Believing Jews and Christians can not escape the perennial dilemma of reconciling the existence of evil with belief in an all - good and all - powerful God.

As a matter of fact, one can wonder why Whitehead would conclude a discussion obviously meant to present a solution to evil with a stern restatement of the concept of evil he just transcended.

When we take the bait and repay evil with evil, eye for eye, dollar for dollar, insult for insult, when we demand our DUE, we not only lose in the end, but we becomeour «enemy,» for we are guilty of the same offenses, tactics, and attitudes.

Paul said we should try to live at peace with everyone (Romans 12) and never repay evil with evil, but to reach out to the world with the love of Christ.

They do nt believe in God but they have served Evil with great success.

And of course, this is exactly how Paul used the passage about burning coals in Romans 12:20 - 21, where he concludes by saying, «overcome evil with good.»

Our front lines are the mosques from where we repel this evil with good words meant to serve humanity.

The «more than» is decisive, for the evils God receives are like impulses that God then renders into a richness of contrast, supplementing evil with its ideal complement, and so achieving aesthetic harmony.

In Buber's early philosophy of Judaism good is identified with decision of the whole being, evil with the directionlessness that results from failure to decide.

For those who hold the dialectical attitude toward evil, good can not exist in solitary splendour, nor is it opposed by a radically separate evil with which it has nothing to do.

Her thought is analogous to the Marxist mythology which identifies evil with the bourgeoisie, the past, and identifies good with the proletariat, the future; Miller identifies evil with the parents and good with the children.

But reconciliation takes real courage — the courage not to be overcome by evil, but to overcome evil with good.

It is possible that we are on the verge of a new era in the history of the Church, under circumstances very different from those we have faced in the past, when Christianity will resemble the mustard seed [Matthew 13:31 - 32], that is, will continue only in the form of small and seemingly insignificant groups, which yet will oppose evil with all their strength and bring Good into this world.

Always he was insistent on the need for peaceful protest, citing John Paul's quotation from the Scriptures not to repay evil with evil but with good.

«Never take your own revenge, beloved, but leave room for the wrath of God... Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.»

«be not overcome by evil - overcome evil with good».

Biblical teaching reflects this straightforward good / evil stance: «Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good», writes Paul in Romans 12:21.

We should likewise overcome evil with good and challenge this system with radical lives of political activism.»

I think it could be considered that I took part in evil with that.

It means restoring a good relationship between humanity and its ecological home, stirring the heart, setting about work in a spirit of thanksgiving, discovering power under the authority of the Spirit, confronting evil with confidence in the sovereignty of God and sharing in the generous economy of God so that nothing is wasted.

Will we ever be able to defeat evil with guns and bombs?

It is always a temptation for individuals, rulers, and governments to think that they can defeat evil with violence, but here, in three of the opening chapters of the Bible, we are told that violence and destruction does not and can not eradicated evil.

That's the same person I followed because he was everything non-evil in a world filled with it... and you can't very well beat evil with more evil.

They are sure that precisely in his boundless creativity God can guarantee the eventual triumph of good, no matter what may be the evil with which he must work and the risks which such working necessarily implies.

As in all such emotional revolts there is a temptation to identify the evil with some evildoer and to make individual men — capitalists, munitions - manufacturers, dictators — responsible for the situation.

When we oppose evil with the same weapons that evil employs, we invariably find ourselves committing the same atrocities, violating the same civil liberties, bending and breaking the same laws, as those whom we oppose.

Loving our enemies and returning evil with good has the power to accomplish things that the weapons of war can never dream of.

How do we overcome evil with good?

Anyway, I really struggle with these books on non-resistance to violence, not because I think they are wrong in theory, or because I think that Jesus didn't show a «third way,» but because I have at various times in life looked evil straight in the eyes, and can not think of how to overcome evil with non-violence.

One main consequence of locating evil with either nature or culture is that it makes the human problem something outside the human will.

Some seem to think that God intended to wipe out evil with the flood, but He knows that this is impossible, as He Himself states in Genesis 8:21.

That which seemeth good, that is evil with god That which in its heart is rejected, that is good with god.

Schulweis, however, uses the term «evil» in an unequivocal sense and equates this sense of evil with Whitehead's notion of destructive discord.