Sentences with phrase «+ year hiatus»

It's fairly well documented (again, after a 20 - 30 + year hiatus) that people want to discuss things either in person, or (if that isn't, an option) then as AT & T used to jingle, via the: «next best thing, to being there...» And it really comes down to what age group (s) you're targeting.

And then he has the cheek to end his account by throwing an accusation that «the glaring 15 + year hiatus in warming which is currently being swept under the rug.»

Former Sandman actor Thomas Haden Church believes that director Sam Raimi may one day return to the Spider - Man franchise after a 10 + year hiatus.

Not exact matches

But picking shorter parts of noisy global temperature curves, giving them suggestive names and then try to «explain» them is not what you'd expect from year 2000 + science methodology (neither would sacrificing a goat or two to the «hiatus» solve any real problems...).

When flatlining temperatures wreck your global warming agenda, refusing to rise after 18 + long years in hiatus, despite record human CO2 emissions over that same period, simply homogenise, adjust (tamper) with the data.

The impetus for the new publicized fears of cooling comes from the indisputable empirical evidence that global warming is suffering a non-predicted «hiatus» (i.e. warming is stalled, paused, stopped, etc.) these last 15 + years.

A climate sensitivity of 1.7 degrees is consistent with a further 20 year hiatus, if the AMO gives us a sinewave of + / -0.1.

Indeed, this dynamics suggests a major multiple harmonic influence component on the climate with a likely astronomical origin (sun + moon + planets) although not yet fully understood in its physical mechanisms, that, as shown in the above figures, can apparently explain also the post 2000 climate quite satisfactorily (even by using my model calibrated from 1850 to 1950, that is more than 50 years before the observed temperature hiatus period since 2000!).

As well as questioning why the «pause» doesn't get a mention in this post on the history of climate science (the RSS website reference @ 25 is likely this post by Carl Mears that certainly makes no mention of the «warming hiatus» being «15 to 18 + years» long), DAN SAGE @ 25 talks of two other topics covered elsewhere by SkS - the CO2 - lagging - temperature saga and the controversal lowering of the bottom of the IPCC ECS range in AR5 (which does not justify talk of ECS being «now... 1degree C, or even a little less», an extremely low value range that has long been proposed by contrarians).