Sentences with phrase «+ year time horizon»

Of course, the bond interest might not quite be enough to cover the traditional LTC premiums right now (and therefore deplete principal slightly), but it will be more than enough once rates rise, which again seems like a reasonable «bet» for someone who still has a 10 - 20 + year time horizon for long - term care and retirement needs (and over that time horizon, the client could have generated an amount equal to the hybrid life / LTC death benefit just with normal growth!).

Let's consider someone with a 10 + year time horizon (a common situation for many people saving for goals such as retirement or college tuition for their children).

Not exact matches

While an aggressive type portfolio will naturally fluctuate over time and has more «volatility,» this is nothing to get scared about because you are saving this money for the long term and over a 10 + year investing horizon you are going to make more money investing in stocks than in bonds.

From Jim Jubak of MSN Money, we get an article detailing 5 blue chip dividend stocks he thinks long term investors (10 Years + time horizon) will do well by dollar cost averaging in now and reinvesting dividends.

This isn't a problem for investors with long time horizons (say 10 + years to retirement) or large enough portfolios to live entirely off dividends, but if your portfolio is small and you need to periodically sell shares to fund living expenses (such as with the 4 % rule), then this short to medium - term risk is something to be aware of as you think about portfolio diversification.

I am in a private job and considering a time horizon of 15 - 20 years to retirement, i would like to invest more 5 - 7k / month for my child future and which gives me a corpus of nearly 1 CR +

But our horizon was 25 + years at that time, so we didn't lose too much sleep over it (we haven't sold or gone to cash, either).

Investments in stocks should ideally be made with a time horizon of 5 + years, with a minimum of 3.

Dear Shreekanth My time horizon is 8 + years and investing in Tata and HDFC balanced fund 4K each I checked overlap from the link given in your article in Fandoo it is 18 %.

Passive approach wins over longer time horizons (10, 15, or 20 + years).

Both Bengen and Blanchett's research suggests the optimal equity exposure for a 30 - year time horizon is approximately 50 % -60 %, a time horizon stretched to 40 + years merits a slightly more aggressive 60 % -65 % equity exposure — Michael Kitces

I am a first time investor and have to invest 20 Lakh amount with a time horizon of 10 + Years.

+ read full definition bonds carry little risk for an investor whose time horizon is short, for example, a person saving for a vacation in 2 years.

There is too much competition at the short time horizons of the market, and not so much over 3 + year periods.

As noted in the blog earlier this week, the difference between a 40 - year time horizon and a 20 - year time horizon is a 5 % + safe withdrawal rate versus a less - than - 4 % withdrawal rate.

As an example of the possible extreme change in radiative forcing in a 50 - year time horizon for Isaken et al (2011)'s 4 x CH4 (i.e. quadrupling the current atmospheric methane burden) case of additional emission of 0.80 GtCH4 / yr is 2.2 Wm - 2, and as the radiative forcing for the current methane emissions of 0.54 GtCH4 / yr is 0.48 Wm - 2, this give an updated GWP for methane, assuming the occurrence of Isaksen et al's 4 x CH4 case in 2040, would be: 33 (per Shindell et al 2009, note that AR5 gives a value of 34) times (2.2 / [0.8 + 0.48]-RRB- divided by (0.54 / 0.48) = 50.