When I simulated how many times would actually measured random value would be indeed true
highest value (sd
= 0.7 was 0.7 for value and 0.5 for a measurement error, both normally distributed), I've got the following results (Number of years, being
highest percentage): 2, 0.801146 10, 0.532256 20, 0.46076 50, 0.384286 100, 0.338422 135, 0.32037 200, 0.30028 1000, 0.232482 10000, 0.165234 I am not sure, but can we conclude that 38 %
likelihood was actually not that small?
A
higher number of schools attended within the semester and a suspension record (non-Indigenous: OR
= 2.36 95 % CI 2.19 to 2.54; Indigenous: OR
= 1.43 95 % CI 1.33 to 1.52) were also positively associated with
likelihood of poor attendance.
This tended to increase the
likelihood of membership to the moderate and
high groups (B
=.19 and.14, p
=.03 and.08, respectively).