Sentences with phrase «= less control»

The simpler the controls are = less control input sent = less bandwidth.

Not exact matches

@Gaunt «Between them they represent the main choice of birth control for women» = > less than 2 % is the main choice?

Compared with the TL system, participants using the M - % DI system were five times less likely to be able to identify the healthier food items (OR = 0.2; 95 % CI 0.1 — 0.5), and those using the CC - % DI system were three times less likely to be able to identify the healthier products (OR = 0.3; 95 % CI 0.1 — 0.9), after controlling for gender, age, education level and household income (Table 2).

For discontinuing any breastfeeding before 12 months, small socioeconomic gradients in the control group were widened in the intervention group (RR = 1.04 and 1.16, respectively, for mothers with secondary education or less).

(A) The body weight of IL - 15Rα — KO mice (n = 20) was 19 % less than that of B6129 control mice (n = 16).

(B) Lean muscle mass, assessed using NMR, was 18 % less in IL - 15Rα — KO mice (n = 8) compared with B6129 control mice (n = 8).

MACE occurred in 14 percent of control patients (n = 83), in 17 percent of those of who received less than 14 million cells (n = 47), in 10 percent of those who received greater than 14 million cells (n = 31; this includes the next group), and in 7 percent of those who received greater than 20 million cells (n = 15).

There was no difference in TSH and free T4 levels, but the diabetic individuals had significantly decrease free T3 levels (p = 0.0001) that averaged 46 % less than controls.

Male tail chasers (n = 34) were shyer (sex * Shyness / Boldness: χ22, 110 = 5.46, p = 0.0194) and less aggressive (sex * Aggressiveness / Humans: χ22, 110 = 5.94, p = 0.0148) compared to the control males, although females (n = 25) also had the same non-significant trend (Fig. 7b).

But those few insiders controlling the system by waving through papers that have an agenda they agree with, and blocking papers that do not buy into the CO2 = AGW conjecture, are making all scientists appear to be less than honest.

By 24 months after delivery of their first child, nurse - visited women, in contrast to those in the control group, were less likely to have had a subsequent pregnancy (29 % vs 41 %, P =.02) and birth (12 % vs 19 %, P =.05).

Students receiving the full intervention also reported significantly less involvement in school misbehavior than did control students (P =.02).

Although there was only a small positive effect of the COPE program on maternal reports of overall parental stress during the PICU stay, as assessed with the Parental Stressor Scale: PICU (Table 4), mothers in the COPE group reported significantly less stress regarding staff communication than did control group mothers (COPE: mean score = 4.3, SD = 3.9; control: mean score = 6.0, SD = 5.9; P <.05).

Adolescents used a 1 (does not describe her at all) to 6 (describes her very well) scale to describe their mothers across three domains: psychological control (e.g., «is less friendly with you if you do not see things her way,» α =.90), firm control («insists that you must do exactly as you are told,» α =.81), and acceptance («enjoys doing things with you,» α =.93).

Significant intervention effects confirmed that intervention group reported less burnout post-test than control group (F (1, 108) = 14.96, p < 0.01; maintained at 3 - month follow - up)

The adolescents who received the BPBR intervention believed more strongly that practicing abstinence would prevent, pregnancy, STDs, and AIDS (p <.0001, p =.04, p =.04), expressed less favorable attitudes toward sexual intercourse (p <.0001, p <.0001, p <.0001), and reported weaker intentions of having sexual intercourse over the next three months (F (1, 144) = 7.58) than did those in the control group.

However, high - and low - hostile behavior subjects had a different pattern of response to the spousal interactions as reflected in their PANAS negative mood ratings, after controlling for visit; high - hostile subjects» moods were more negative after each of the interactions, while low - hostile subjects» moods were less negative (F1, 40 = 5.24; P =.03).

Overall, children with deviant eating behavior reported higher perceived parental control [2.82 (0.79) vs. 2.52 (0.74)-RSB- than children with normal eating behavior, t = − 3.81, df = 366, p <.001, d =.39, slightly less perceived confidence [3.18 (0.51) vs. 3.31 (0.43)-RSB-, t = 2.52, df = 366, p =.012, d =.27, and higher conflict / rejection [1.99 (0.61) vs. 1.60 (0.49)-RSB-, t = − 6.80, df = 366, p <.001, d =.68, while no group differences were apparent for the care and lack of limitations subscales.