Sentences with phrase «[oral contraceptive»

(Set aside for now the apparent hypocrisy implied by the fact that Hobby Lobby apparently invests some of its 401 (k) employee retirement plan's money in the pharmaceutical companies that produce the very contraceptives that Hobby Lobby is so hell - bent on avoiding paying for.)

«Oral contraceptive pills contain estrogen, which keeps your body from growing an egg and ovulating,» she says.

Particularly if you are over the age of 35, smoking cigarettes while using the NuvaRing can increase risk of heart problems from combination hormonal contraceptives, so before you decide this is the best method for you, consider your lifestyle choices and have a discussion with your doctor.

The same mix of science and conviction is central to editor - at - large Kimberly Weisul's feature about Saundra Pelletier, CEO of Evofem, maker of a breakthrough contraceptive gel.

The FDA's 2011 recall included the following oral contraceptives: Cyclafem 7 / 7/7, Cyclafem 1/35, Emoquette, Gildess FE 1.5 / 30, Gildess FE 1/20, Orsythia, Previfem and Tri-Previfem.

It's important to speak with your doctor about any concerns you may have, and he or she can help you weigh your contraceptive options.

More than 100 businesses and religious organizations have sued the federal government to be exempt from the ACA's contraceptive requirements since Obamacare became law in 2010.

The mandate for free contraceptive coverage was one of the most contested polices under the Affordable Care Act and generated many lawsuits by employers that cited religious objections.

Congress later slashed the budget that was intended to fund free or low - cost contraceptives.

Closely held corporations with religious objections to contraceptive coverage were exempt as a result of the Hobby Lobby decision in June 2014, until the Administration issued new regulations in July 2015.

These regulations have the effect of restoring contraceptive coverage to workers employed by closely held corporations with religious objections.

Globally, more than 200 million women say they don't want to have a child within the next two years but aren't using contraceptives.

The new regulations extend the accommodation available to religiously affiliated nonprofit employers to closely held2 for profit corporations that have adopted a resolution establishing that the corporation objects to some or all contraceptive services on account of the owners» sincerely held religious beliefs.3 Starting in the new plan year, Hobby Lobby and other closely held corporations with religious objections will be required to notify their insurer, third party administrator, or HHS so that the insurer or administrator can still provide the contraceptive coverage directly to the employees and their dependents.

Use of tampons will not reduce the contraceptive efficacy of NuvaRing.

While using NuvaRing, you should not use certain female barrier contraceptive methods such as a vaginal diaphragm, cervical cap or female condom as your back - up method of birth control because NuvaRing may interfere with the correct placement and position of a diaphragm, cervical cap or female condom.

[300] In Burwell v. Hobby Lobby the Court ruled that «closely - held» for - profit corporations could be exempt on religious grounds under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act from regulations adopted under the ACA that would have required them to pay for insurance that covered certain contraceptives.

Has anyone cited this passage in briefs challenging the contraceptive / abortifacient mandate?

As they point out, increases in general education and economic development are strongly correlated to family planning, not the availability of contraceptive technology.

Officious social engineers of both the right and the left abuse the public schools to promote parochial agendas, whether by sanctioning the recitation of prayers over the school loudspeaker or by the distribution of contraceptives despite parental objections, thereby undermining parental authority and impairing the ability of parents to form their own family values.

But Podesta and his candidate want to force a religious order of Catholic women to cooperate in the provision of contraceptives and abortifacients; they want to compel small businesses to cater to same - sex marriage ceremonies; and they want physicians to refer troubled patients for «transgender» treatment — all against the Catholic understanding of the right to act on one's conscience (in these cases, one's rightly formed conscience).

With the current regime in power and the push to force Catholic organizations to provide insurance coverage for contraceptives and abortifacients, I'd say we're moving in the opposite direction.

Over at Public Discourse, Greg Pfundstein and Meghan Grizzle report on the latest decision by the Gates Foundation to put more than $ 4 billion behind efforts to expand the use of contraceptives worldwide.

And that's why the ObamaCare contraceptive mandate is unconstitutional (although I would want that fact expressed with a doctrine better than the «compelling» SHERBERT one affirmed in the RFRA).

A survey released Tuesday from the Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life found that among Catholics who have heard about the issue, 55 % support giving religious institutions that object to birth control an exemption from the federal contraceptive rule, while 39 % oppose exempting those institutions.

But when it claims that the «free» contraceptive coverage can be afforded by the insurer because «cost - savings» will result from «improvements in women's health and fewer childbirths,» the administration is admitting that the contraception is already being paid for by the employer, if its policy covers childbirth and women's health in general.

Barrier contraceptives are definitely not.

The HHS contraception mandate requires church - related institutions to collaborate with the dominant, contraceptive culture of our time, and to do so in a public way.

When the Obama administration claims that employers will not «fund» the contraceptive coverage provided by insurers, it speaks falsely.

The statement that will have some social conservatives up in arms is, «I don't believe employers should tell someone whether they could have contraceptive care or not.»

Every woman in America should have access to contraceptives.

Or the President bowing to pressure on contraceptives.

Many other aspects as well (Catholics don't use contraceptives cause it's a sin?

Gerald: Most contraceptives are not abortifactents.

The forty years since Humanae Vitae appeared have also vindicated the encyclical's fear that governments would use the new contraceptive technology coercively.

The Bible does not explicitly say not to use contraceptives.

I am happy that the writer had the choices that she did... She is also free to decide whether or not she is a Catholic... She however, took an available medication for a health problem... most Catholic facilities recognize such health problems and allow for that treatment... I am completly puzzled, though, that she would not want other Catholics to be able to choose differently than she did... for those people who wish to use contraceptive services and medication, options are open to them... I am not Catholic, did not grow up in a faith based family, and don't know whether a God exists or not... However, to leave a relgious group with no option but to contradict its own tenets is an attempt by those who don't believe in those tenents to mock them, certainly, but more to erode them... this seems the aim of many and when those folks operate from inside the government... that intrusion is an overreach of the govenrment...

We just took it as a matter or course that we purchased our own contraceptives.

why not use contraceptives to prevent unwanted pregnancies!

First, the principal law in Connecticut banned not the sale but the use of contraceptives.

(i) a woman's right to choose; (ii) teaching evolution in school; (iii) medical immunization of teen girls against HPV; (iv) assisted suicide; (v) gay marriage; (vi) my right to view art and theatre deemed «offensive,» «blasphemous» or «obscene» by theists (vii) basic $ ex education for older school children; (viii) treating drug abuse as principally a medical issue; (xi) population control; (x) buying alcohol on a Sunday; (xi) use of condoms and other contraceptives (xii) stem cell research.

contraceptives prevent people who aren't ready financially or emotionally from having kids and they prevent acne and mood swings in young peoples who's lives can be negatively affected.

-- What if the government got the insurance companies to pay Contraceptive costs «out of their profits».?

Emergency contraceptives were there when I was uncertain about whether I'd become pregnant and needed reassurance.

The Decline of Males, his 1999 book, was particularly controversial among feminists for its argument that female contraceptives had altered the balance between the sexes in disturbing new ways (especially by taking from men any say in whether they could have children).

Second, Weigel errs in saying that Eisenstadt v. Baird (1972) extended the right to contraceptives to «nonmarried couples.»

And don't forget a pregnancy IS NOT A DISEASE, so what disease are contraceptives «preventing» if they are such a «boon» to women's health?

Hypothesizing that «a decrease in the cost of syphilis due to penicillin [which, in 1943, was found to treat syphilis effectively] spurred an increase in risky non-traditional sex,» the Emory University economist Andrew Francis discovered evidence that «the era of modern sexuality originated in the mid to late 1950s,» prior to the debut of oral contraceptive pills in 1960.

Giving out contraceptives will not automatically make all the rich people of the world share what they have with the poor.

As a Catholic, I stand with President Obama's decision to require religious institutions to provide access to contraceptives.

Contraceptives do NEITHER.