Sentences with phrase «10th centile»

By school entry, 43 — 47 % of Aboriginal children have markers of developmental vulnerability.12, 13 In 2009, the first - ever national census of childhood development at school entry showed that Aboriginal children were 2 — 3 times more likely than non-Aboriginal children to be developmentally vulnerable — defined as an Australian Early Development Census (AEDC) score below the 10th centile — on one or more domains.14 The Longitudinal Survey of Australian Children reported similar disparities for cognitive outcomes among Aboriginal children aged 4 — 5 years, although the number of Aboriginal children was very small and not representative of the Aboriginal population.15 There is currently a dearth of empirical research that identifies the drivers of positive early childhood health and development in Aboriginal children, or characterises vulnerable developmental trajectories.

For example, Strauss9 found that 34 % of obese (defined as BMI > 95th centile), white, 13 — 14 year old girls had low self esteem (defined as < 10th centile) compared to 8 % of non-obese white girls.

The AEDC data are collected by teachers who complete an online checklist for each child in their first year of formal full - time school (∼ 5 years old) covering the five ECD areas previously noted of physical development, social competence, emotional maturity, language, and cognitive development (eg, academic learning), and general knowledge and communication.17 Children are scored on each of these domains, and categorised as «developmentally vulnerable» (≤ 10th centile), «developmentally at risk» (between 10th and 25th centiles) and «developmentally on track» (≥ 25th centile) 17 Children who are developmentally at risk on one or more ECD domain (ie, DV1) is typically reported in AEDC publications.

The highest rate of SGA occurred in pregnancies where no folate had been taken, with 16.3 % under the 10th centile and 8.9 % under the 5th centile.

When comparing pre - and post-conceptual folic acid supplementation, the prevalence of birth weight lower than the 10th centile was 9.9 % and 13.8 % respectively, while that of birth weight under the 5th centile was 4.8 % and 7.1 % respectively.

Not exact matches

In the article, Stamatina Iliodromiti from the University of Glasgow, UK, and colleagues found birth weight less than 25th or greater than 85th centile to be associated with greater risk of adverse outcomes compared with birth weight within these cutoffs, suggesting an expansion of the definition of «fetus at risk» beyond the less than 10th or greater than 90th centile range that is commonly used to trigger surveillance of fetal well - being and / or delivery.

They further estimated that by offering delivery to women outside of the 25th to 85th centile (rather than the traditionally used 10th and 90th centiles), an additional 1143 deliveries would be required to prevent one fatal event (422 additional deliveries at or below 25th centile; and 721 additional deliveries at or above the 85th centile).