The court cited a number of factors personal to him, including that he had been admitted to
practice both in California and before the
1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, had a stellar academic record and was valedictorian of his class, had scored well on the California bar
exam and on the MPRE, and, through his representation of himself in his own case, had provided a «positive illustration of his skills.»
Mitchell had already been admitted to
practice both in California and before the
1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, had a stellar academic record and was valedictorian of his class, had scored well on the California bar
exam and on the MPRE, and, through his representation of himself in his admission case, had provided a «positive illustration of his skills.»