Sentences with phrase «5th cir»

July 28, 2005), appeal filed (5th Cir.
In the case of Wegmann v. Mannino, 253 F. 2d 627 (5th Cir.
Further, the court found that Walker's eyesight, which was corrected to 20/30, was not a handicap as a matter of law (citing Chandler v. City of Dallas, 2 F. 3d 1385, 1390 (5th Cir.
(quoting United States v. Wong Kim Bo, 472 F. 2d 720, 722 (5th Cir.
1326, 1338 (S.D. Tex. 1996); Burton v. Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., 798 F. 3d 222, 238 - 239 (5th Cir.
Similarly, in United States v. Phillips, 477 F. 3d 215, 218 - 20 (5th Cir.
He discussed the Fifth Circuit's reversal of the approval of attorneys» fees in the In re High Sulfur Content Gasoline Products Liability Litigation, 517 F. 3d 220 (5th Cir.
Stated differently, rights provided by copyright law are governed by federal law, not state contracting or licensing law: Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel, Co., (1964) 376 U.S. 225; Compco Corp. v. Day - Brite Lighting, Inc., (1964) 376 U.S. 234, 237; Vault Corp. v. Quaid Software Ltd., 847 F. 2d 255, 270 (5th Cir.
2002) said «yes,» while the Fifth Circuit, in Baker Botts L.L.P. v. ASARCO LLC, 751 F. 3d 291 (5th Cir.
However, the Fifth Circuit in re Application of the United States for Historical Cell Site Data, 724 F. 3d 600 (5th Cir.
One remedy provided under the PCA is the exclusion of evidence, but according to United States v. Wolffs, 594 F. 2d 77, 85 (5th Cir.
«In a recent Fifth Circuit decision, United States v. Estate of Parsons, 367 F. 3d 409 (5th Cir.
Autrey v. Swisher, 155 F. 2d 18 (C.C.A. 5th Cir.
2313, 2322 (2011); Garner v. Wolfinbarger, 430 F. 2d 1093, 1103 - 04 (5th Cir.
Programs, 819 F. 3d 116 (5th Cir.
Moore v. CITGO Refining and Chemicals Co., L.P., 735 F. 3d 309, 315 — 316 (5th Cir.
denied, 540 U.S. 1227 (2004); United States v. Turner, 319 F. 3d 716, 721 - 723 (5th Cir.)
The insured also raised the decision in Apache Corp. v. Great Western Insurance Co., 662 F.App» x 252 (5th Cir.
(See United States v. Lucien, 61 F. 3d 366 (5th Cir.
of Educ., 806 F. 3d 289 (5th Cir.
of Educ., 874 F. 2d 1036, 1050, 5th Cir.1989) This concept of providing students with «supplementary aids and services necessary to achieve educational goals» could be applied to all students.
In Watson v. Graves, 909 F. 2d 1549 (5th Cir.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z