Sentences with phrase «9th circuit court decisions»

Washington About Blog This blog particularly focuses on Washington State and 9th Circuit court decisions and the rulings of the Washington Public Employees Relations Commission.

Washington About Blog This blog particularly focuses on Washington State and 9th Circuit court decisions and the rulings of the Washington Public Employees Relations Commission.

Washington About Blog This blog particularly focuses on Washington State and 9th Circuit court decisions and the rulings of the Washington Public Employees Relations Commission.

The supplement provides access to the articles of the journal, as well as to case reviews of 9th Circuit court decisions and to comments.

This blog particularly focuses on Washington State and 9th Circuit court decisions and the rulings of the Washington Public Employees Relations Commission.

Washington About Blog This blog particularly focuses on Washington State and 9th Circuit court decisions and the rulings of the Washington Public Employees Relations Commission.

Washington About Blog This blog particularly focuses on Washington State and 9th Circuit court decisions and the rulings of the Washington Public Employees Relations Commission.

The court's conservative justices said they were inclined to reverse a 9th Circuit Court decision requiring immigration judges to give a bond hearing and consider possible release for noncitizens who have been jailed for more than six months, while the liberal justices sounded unsure as to whether a specific time limit can be upheld.

Attorneys for Zillow filed a motion late last week asking the judge to grant summary judgment in its favor as a matter of law — referring to a recent 9th Circuit Court decision in the case Perfect 10 Inc. v. Giganews Inc. — before the jury is permitted to issue a verdict.

Not exact matches

The filing also argues that the 9th Circuit made the test for defeating a trademark too strict, and that it should — based on an older decision by a different appeals court — instead have simply looked at how most people use the word in question.

Acknowledging the major commercial consequences of his decision, Wu said he would allow an immediate appeal to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has predictably upheld the district court decision declaring California's Proposition 8 invCourt of Appeals has predictably upheld the district court decision declaring California's Proposition 8 invcourt decision declaring California's Proposition 8 invalid.

However, the travel ban, which is currently on hold because of a decision by the federal 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, has other elected officials in the county, specifically Democrats, worried about Astorino's support for the ban and that it does in fact unfairly target Muslims.

The case has been argued and is awaiting decision from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

While it still reversed the district court dismissal and remanded the case back to the court, in its most recent decision, the 9th Circuit based its discussion on the U.S. Supreme Court's finding in Dudenhoeffer that there is no presumption of prudence for employee stock ownership plan fiduciaries beyond the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) exemption from the otherwise applicable duty to divercourt dismissal and remanded the case back to the court, in its most recent decision, the 9th Circuit based its discussion on the U.S. Supreme Court's finding in Dudenhoeffer that there is no presumption of prudence for employee stock ownership plan fiduciaries beyond the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) exemption from the otherwise applicable duty to divercourt, in its most recent decision, the 9th Circuit based its discussion on the U.S. Supreme Court's finding in Dudenhoeffer that there is no presumption of prudence for employee stock ownership plan fiduciaries beyond the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) exemption from the otherwise applicable duty to diverCourt's finding in Dudenhoeffer that there is no presumption of prudence for employee stock ownership plan fiduciaries beyond the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) exemption from the otherwise applicable duty to diversify.

To the extent that the Amgen defendants were arguing that the Supreme Court decision established new standards of liability to be considered, the 9th Circuit noted that it had already considered in its previous case that fiduciaries are not required to perform an act that would do more harm than good to retirement plan participants.

In a decision that strikes a blow against the federal government's controversial practice of excluding industry from consent decrees with environmental citizen groups, a practice known as «sue - and - settle,» the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit overturned the district court's approval of a consent decree between a coalition of environmental groups and several federal agencies in Conservation Northwest v. Sherman, No. 11 - 35729 (9thCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit overturned the district court's approval of a consent decree between a coalition of environmental groups and several federal agencies in Conservation Northwest v. Sherman, No. 11 - 35729 (9thcourt's approval of a consent decree between a coalition of environmental groups and several federal agencies in Conservation Northwest v. Sherman, No. 11 - 35729 (9th Cir.

The ruling allows ARB to appeal Judge O'Neill's decision immediately to the US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit.

California must assert its right to regulate industrial hemp as permitted by the U.S. Constitution, the U.S. Congress and the 2004 9th U.S. Circuit Court decision in HIA v. DEA.

A 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision is pending on whether to uphold U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California Judge Vince Chhabria's order sending those suits back to state court from federal cCourt of Appeals decision is pending on whether to uphold U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California Judge Vince Chhabria's order sending those suits back to state court from federal cCourt for the Northern District of California Judge Vince Chhabria's order sending those suits back to state court from federal ccourt from federal courtcourt.

If the Court chooses to reverse the 9th Circuit's decision in Raich, then McCoy (CA9), Stewart (CA9) and Maxwell (CA11) will certainly be reversed...

Yesterday, the Law Memo blog posted a link to a 9th Circuit decision, Pollard v. GEO Group, holding — contrary to what other courts of appeals have ruled — that federal prison inmates may recover damages under the Bivens doctrine from employees of private corporations running those prisons pursuant to contracts with the Bureau of Prisons.

In that case, there is no ITC - specific argument: Motorola can just say that a district court decision from a different circuit (7th Circuit) shouldn't matter in Seattle (9th Circuit)-- but Judge Posner's FRAND thinking will be taken very seriously there, I'circuit (7th Circuit) shouldn't matter in Seattle (9th Circuit)-- but Judge Posner's FRAND thinking will be taken very seriously there, I'Circuit) shouldn't matter in Seattle (9th Circuit)-- but Judge Posner's FRAND thinking will be taken very seriously there, I'Circuit)-- but Judge Posner's FRAND thinking will be taken very seriously there, I'm sure.

Relying on decisions from the 9th and 10th circuits, the 8th Circuit held that because the proceeding involved a nonparty and the main action was pending in another district, the district court's order was immediately reviewable under the collateral order doctrine.

And in a 2009 9th Circuit decision (Norwood v. Vance), the debate over a jury instruction using the word «deference» inspired the court to note that «deference» is a common English word, and is «not Urdu or Klingon.»

It is interesting that the court granted review in the last of these questions because it was not the basis of the 9th Circuit decision now being reviewed by the Supreme Ccourt granted review in the last of these questions because it was not the basis of the 9th Circuit decision now being reviewed by the Supreme CourtCourt.

The 9th Circuit upheld the Hawaii federal district court decision, focusing primarily on a federal statute that bars discrimination in issuing visas based on national origin or country of residence and also on separation of powers considerations.

Court Rejects Actor's Copyright Claim This week, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in the United States issued an en banc decision reversing an earlier decision restraining YouTube from displaying the controversial film Innocence of Muslims.

If you only need to know about decisions from the California Supreme Court and the 9th Circuit, you can frame your search accordingly.

What's interesting, however, is that what may have finally nudged the Supreme Court to accept review of Stoneridge isn't the split between the 8th and 9th Circuits alone but, rather, a recently issued 5th Circuit decision in an Enron - related case.

The bankruptcy court agreed, and the 9th Circuit, in a Feb. 27 decision, affirmed.

San Francisco's 9th Circuit Court of Appeals cited Bellesiles» research in its decision Silveira v. Lockyer, Dec. 5, 2002, which ruled that the Second Amendment established a collective, not an individual, right to «keep and bear arms.»

These include: United States v. Resendiz - Ponce, which presents the question whether the omission of an element from a federal indictment can constitute harmless error (9th Circuit says no); Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc. v. Metrophones Telecommunications, Inc., on whether a provider of pay phone services can sue a long distance carrier for alleged violations of the Federal Communications Commission's regulations concerning compensation for coinless pay phone calls (9th Circuit says yes); Cunningham v. California, a sentencing case involving whether whether California's Determinate Sentencing Law violates the 6th and 14th amendments to the U.S. Constitution by permitting California state court judges at sentencing to impose enhanced sentenced based on their determination of facts neither found by the jury nor admitted by the defendant; and Carey v. Musladin, reviewing the 9th Circuit's decision to overturn a murder conviction of a defendant who claimed he was denied a fair trial because the victim's relatives appeared in court wearing buttons with the deceased's picture on them.

Today is Equal Pay Day, and it follows yesterday's decision from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in Rizo v. Yovino, which ruled that employers can not rely on employees» past salaries to justify paying women less than men.

Here's why: Litigator, law writing prof and recovering broadcast journalist Williams read the 9th Circuit Court's decision to reverse immigration judge Nathan Gordon's decision in a case called de Leon v. Gonzales.

When von Schoenebeck re-filed in California, KLM immediately moved to dismiss for untimeliness, which was granted by a US District Court in San Francisco and affirmed by a split 2 - 1 decision in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.

Now here's something you don't see every day: A criminal challenging an unfavorable decision of the 9th Circuit and the Supreme Court granting cert.

The district court can still go on to issue its final decision, and even if it's in line with SCOTUS as it must be, then surely the losing side can appeal that to the 9th circuit and then do we go back to SCOTUS a second time for the final ruling?

In a split decision, the 9th Circuit upheld the District Court's ruling.