North Carolina's new report cards represent a move towards ease of understanding relevant data, but there's concern among school advocates that the formula used to calculate
the A-F grades needs improvement.
Not exact matches
Rather than relying only on a numerical index or an
A-F grading system that would obscure the critical information
needed for improvement, the measures above should be part of a dashboard that informs educators and the community about progress in each area and allows for analysis of what's working and where attention is
needed.
These reforms include charter schools, education scholarship accounts, special
needs vouchers, the Literacy Based Promotion Act of 2013, and a clear
A-F grading system for schools and school districts.
The
A-F grades have received mixed reviews because public school advocates say the lower
grades will unfairly stigmatize schools, while proponents argue that progress indicators
need to be easy for the average public to understand.
This includes authorization of the state's first charter schools, passage of the Equal Opportunity for Students with Special
Needs Act, 3rdGrade Reading Gate, and an
A-F grading system for all schools and school districts.
These reforms, including
A-F grading of school districts, third -
grade reading gate, charter schools, and the education scholarship account program for students with special
needs, are working and changing lives.
This includes authorization of the state's first charter schools, passage of the Equal Opportunity for Students with Special
Needs Act, 3rd Grade Reading Gate, and an
A-F grading system for all schools and school districts.
In order for the Michigan Department of Education to replace its current top - to - bottom accountability system with the
A-F grading system, it would've
needed the state legislature to act by June 30, 2017.
Our recommendations aim to address this disparity, improving the inputs that matter in schools that the state's system has categorized as those most in
need.6 As noted above, the Committee does not support the current
A-F grading system, but for purposes of these recommendations accepts it as given and focuses on using the letter
grades to identify schools in acute
need of additional support.
As noted above, the Committee does not support the current
A-F grading system, but for purposes of these recommendations accepts it as given and focuses on using the letter
grades to identify schools in acute
need of additional support.
Pressed for answers this week, Sen. Jerry Tillman (R - Randolph), a supporter of the
A-F school
grades, told N.C. Policy Watch that in terms of how the
A-F school
grading formula works, — 80 percent of a
grade is based on students» achievement at one point in time, and 20 percent is based on students» growth over time — he's taking a wait - and - see approach, speculating that it will take some time to see if the formula
needs tweaking to present a better picture of which schools are helping their students grow and which are not.