Sentences with phrase «aa =»

If we accept the premise that AA = ED then these equations are correct (the premise is not correct, as shown in Part Two).

Update 31st May — the author comments in the ensuing discussion that Aa = Ed is an «experimental» conclusion.

This fact is a direct arithmetic consequence of Miskolczi's first empirical rule, Aa = Ed, resulting the new form of Ramanathan's G = Su - OLR as G = Ed - Eu, meaning that the greenhouse effect equals to the downwelling radiative heating minus the upwelling convective cooling — as it must be in our radiative - convective atmosphere.

Is is possible to derive theoretically an equilibrium tau, simply from the four new relationships (here Aa = Ed is one of them).

I know pretty well how tau is calculated, where Aa = Ed is necessary and where not.

How is it possible to claim that AA = ED and not work through the basic consequences (e.g., the equations in the maths section above) to deal with the inevitable questions on thermodynamics basics?

[He did not assume Aa = Ed as a condition of the tau - calculation.

In respect of Aa = Ed which are quantified on page 24 of the 2004 paper, which is where we should stick to, Ed is calculated on page 21 - 23; Aa is derived from the Su amount and the OLR, both quantified.

There has been much discussion of if Aa = Ed exactly, or just approximately.

whether AA = ED, or, not,.

If exactly all of the radiation absorbed by the atmosphere is re-radiated to the surface and absorbed by the surface (AA = ED) then these points follow for certain:

The Aa = Ed approximation is still far better than the ad - hoc feedback parameters of the GCMs.

Your paper implies otherwise, and your two supporters that I have read so far — here and on Roy Spencer's blog — have asserted that Aa = Ed.

4, for each radiosonde ascent the ED = AA = SU — ST = SU (1 − exp (− τ A)-RRB- = SU (1 − TA) = SU.A (5) relationships are closely satisfied.

However, as Aa = Su — St, this has a smaller impact (as both Su and St suffer the same calculation flaw).

Is is possible to derive theoretically an equilibrium tau, simply from the four new relationships (here Aa = Ed is one of them, M7 is another).

Part Four — a minor digression into another error that seems to have crept into the Aa = Ed relationship

Trying it the other way, by setting K so that AA = ED brought the temperatures at the ground into near equality.

Aa = Ed, is not required by Miskolczi or derived by him; it is based on empirical observations:

Anyway Miskolczi is discussed at Spencer's blog; Aa = Ed and the constant Tau or optical depth are more or less the same thing; Miskolczi measured them in various ways:

That is his requirement that Aa = Ed; energy in equals energy out.

He does that to the point that he contradicts explicitly his own understanding in the discussion of the (approximate) equality Aa = Ed and its significance.

Not exact matches

This interaction did not replicate in the Dunedin cohort (P = 0.55); breastfed children with AA, AG, and GG genotypes had IQs of 102.7, 103.6, and 102.7, respectively, whereas nonbreastfed children had IQs of 99.1, 96.0, and 98.4.

Astrometric analysis suggests that Star D is in an elliptical orbit (e = 0.34) around Star Aa and has roughly a fifth of Sol's mass (Wulff Dieter Heintz, 1994, pages 2341 and 2346; and Heintz, 1987, page 1080 — which Heintz referred to as Stars A and Aa versus the more typical designations Aa and Ab).

(aa - KAH pah - DAH rah - JAH - cop - poh - TAHS - anna) eka = one pada = foot or leg raja = king kapota = pigeon or dove

* Source: Nielsen National TV View L +7 US AA %; excluding repeats, specials, sports, and < 5 TCs; Season To - Date = 9/21/15 -2 / 7/16

Therefore, the value of the 2,000 AA miles we've earned is equal to 2,000 x $ 0.017 = $ 34.

Earnings Formula for the Citi ® / AAdvantage ® Platinum Select ® World Elite ™ Mastercard ®: Spend $ 500 on a roundtrip AA flight x 2 miles per dollar = 1,000 AAdvantage miles.

Average (Aa) and effective (Ae) alleles per locus of 33 autosomal STRs for case (n = 37) and control (n = 102) English bulldogs

Earnings Formula for the Citi ® / AAdvantage ® Platinum Select ® World Elite ™ Mastercard ®: Spend $ 500 on a roundtrip AA flight x 2 miles per dollar = 1,000 AAdvantage miles.

It is pretty clear in the AA CC forum that downgrading = closing, which will reset the clock.

Citi AA Executive Card ($ 450 or so) = free Admirals Club passes - AND - 10K EQM when you spend money of about $ 40K per year.

A regression analysis points to a clear link between GCR and the aa - index, and the analysis of variance yields R2 = 0.1466 and the p - value = 0.

Think about — qualitatively — the new Trenberth - Fasullo - Kiehl cartoon: 1.87 = - ln (1 - Ed / Su) or Ed = Su * (1 - exp -LRB--1.87)-RRB- or Ed = Aa.

But you have not addressed what I * was * objecting to, Ferenc: People are using your work to claim that Ed = Aa, and I was discussing in detail why that might APPEAR to be the case, but can not be the case for a greenhouse atmosphere.

On the other hand you say: ``... People are using your work to claim that Ed = Aa, and I was discussing in detail why that might APPEAR to be the case, but can not be the case for a greenhouse atmosphere....»

Calculated Aa, Ed / Aa, Su / Eu, Su / OLR, all with emissivity = 1, are in columns M to P.

a) the apparently invented equations — Ed = Aa, eq 7 and flux = kinetic energy (see this and previous articles for the details)

And I am pointing out that because there are apparently unaddressed errors Aa ~ = Ed might mean Ed = 0.94 Aa.

You may even write an article about Aa and Ed, but I am sure if you compute the quantities correctly, you will end up with the same results, and I shall be very happy that you prove the Aa ~ = Ed relationship.

The part I still need to figure out is were the term exp -LRB-- tau) in the equation f = 1/2 + tau / 2 + exp -LRB-- tau) comes from and how does it relate to my model, as it seems to be key in Miskolczi's derivation, bringing AA ~ ED as well as bringing the bottom atmospheric temperature equal to ground temp.

The energy absorbed in total by the atmosphere = AA + K + F, where F is absorbed solar radiation in the atmosphere.

Perhaps when you have covered some of the more important matters already raised in these articles we can go back and discuss what impact ED = 0.97 AA instead of ED = AA has on your theory.

M. partitioned the components of Ramanathan's G as Su = Aa + St and OLR = Eu + St.. He computed them spectrally and integrally by reproducable methods on verifiable databases.

The author says on this blog: «I think I was the first who showed the Aa ~ = Ed relationship with reasonable quantitative accuracy.

M2007 tells us that Ed = Aa due to Kirchhoff's law.

Or if fig 2 IS wrong, and the author has made a mistake, please confirm, calculate the true ratio of Ed / Aa for real world emissivities (e.g., ε = 0.96) and demonstrate that the results of the paper do not change with the corrected values propagating through all of the equations and calculations.

Insurer LV = has stepped into the legal services market, following in the footsteps of insurance giants Admiral, the AA, Ageas, Direct Line and Allianz.

This 36 - item self - report measure of AAS yields continuous scores on attachment anxiety (18 items, e.g. «I often worry that my partner will not want to stay with me»; from 1 = strongly disagree to 7 = strongly agree) and attachment avoidance (18 items, e.g. «I find it difficult to allow myself to depend on romantic partners») dimensions.

The age group of 46 to 60 significantly showed the lowest values on the AAS «depend» compared to the other two age groups with η2 = 0.01, which meant a small but relevant effect (see Table 2).