Not exact matches
Much of the data contained in the below sections have been generated by
AAAS, through
analyses of the President's annual
budget and Congressional appropriations, while other data is from other sources like the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and the National Science Foundation (NSF) National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics.
The original
AAAS analysis of the outyears in the President's
budget, published on May 16, was based on a literal interpretation of the language contained in the President's
budget that would have required a reduction of $ 40 billion in discretionary outlays in FY 2001 and $ 81 billion in FY 2002 in order to balance under CBO's economic assumptions.
Each February through April,
AAAS bases its
analyses on the OMB data, but
AAAS also collects detailed R&D information from individual federal agencies reflecting their revisions to data made after the President's
budget was prepared.
Under the assumptions used in the
AAAS analysis, the President's plan and the congressional
budget resolution yield different results for the key R&D agencies in the outyears.
In 1995
AAAS for the first time prepared an
analysis of the outyear projections contained in the congressional
budget resolution.
The
AAAS analysis of the FY 1997
budget resolution projected a 22 percent cut to nondefense R&D (middle dotted line).
The revised
AAAS analysis (contained in Appendix B) reduces projected discretionary
budget authority by the same amounts in FY 2001 and 2002.
The
AAAS analysis, Projected Effects of the President's FY 1998
Budget on Federal R&D (see Table 5), calculates the effects of the President's latest budget proposals on federal R&D during the period FY 1997 -
Budget on Federal R&D (see Table 5), calculates the effects of the President's latest
budget proposals on federal R&D during the period FY 1997 -
budget proposals on federal R&D during the period FY 1997 - 2002.
Since 1976, the
AAAS R&D
Budget and Policy Program has served as a leading source of
analysis on funding and policy issues affecting federal support for research and development (R&D).
AAAS Analysis of the President's FY 1998
Budget on Federal R&D
AAAS Analysis of Outyear Effects of Balanced
Budget Plans on Nondefense R&D
Visit the
AAAS R&D
Budget and Policy Program for the latest AAAS analysis of the federal R&D b
Budget and Policy Program for the latest
AAAS analysis of the federal R&D
budgetbudget.
This spring,
AAAS prepared similar
analyses of the outyear projections contained in the President's FY 1997
budget and the FY 1997 congressional
budget resolution.
AAAS's May
analysis was based on a specific footnote contained in the President's
budget.
Source:
AAAS analyses of defense and nondefense R&D, based on detailed
budget account projections in the Public Budget Database of the Budget of the United States Government FY
budget account projections in the Public
Budget Database of the Budget of the United States Government FY
Budget Database of the
Budget of the United States Government FY
Budget of the United States Government FY 1998.
AAAS has completed a full
analysis of the
budget proposal.
AAAS» R&D
Budget and Policy Program has been providing independent
analyses of federal research and development programs for more than 40 years.
The full
AAAS analysis, due later this month, will look in detail at the president's
budget request, which sets the stage for the annual
budget debate on Capitol Hill.
Looking only at the base
budget (which excludes any mandatory spending proposals), basic research would decline by 2.3 percent while applied research would rise by 2.8 percent, the
AAAS analysis finds.
R&D spending in the 12 appropriations measures that the House Appropriations Committee has approved would increase spending by $ 3.1 billion, a 2.1 % increase over fiscal 2016, and the 12 measures the Senate Appropriations Committee has approved would boost spending by $ 4.7 billion, a 3.2 % increase over fiscal 2016, said
AAAS» latest R&D
budget analysis report.
In addition to the 8 September
analysis and roundup of FY 2016 appropriations, the
AAAS R&D
Budget and Policy Program has also maintained an appropriations tracker showing the status of each of the bills.
«The suite of bills already passed would increase federal research & development (R&D) funding by an estimated 2.1 % above fiscal year 2016 levels in the House and 3.2 % above FY 2016 levels in the Senate, slightly above the rate of inflation,»
AAAS wrote, citing objective
analysis completed by the association's R&D
Budget and Policy Program.
Overall federal spending on research and development (R&D) will grow by 5 % under a fiscal 2017
budget deal expected to be approved by Congress this week, according to an analysis by the R&D Budget and Policy Program at AAAS in Washington, D.C. (publisher of ScienceIns
budget deal expected to be approved by Congress this week, according to an
analysis by the R&D
Budget and Policy Program at AAAS in Washington, D.C. (publisher of ScienceIns
Budget and Policy Program at
AAAS in Washington, D.C. (publisher of ScienceInsider).