This is contrary to the 2011
AAN guideline, which found gabapentin to be probably effective.
The seizure drug valproate and capsaicin cream, which were considered probably effective in the 2011
AAN guideline, were ineffective in this meta - analysis.
Not exact matches
Trouble is that, even under the three concussion grading systems in most common use in the 1990's and early 2000's (Dr. Bob Cantu's 2001 so - called «evidence - based»
guidelines, 1 the 1991 Colorado Medical Society (CMS) guidleines, 2 and the 1997 American Academy of Neurology (
AAN) 3
guidelines)- all of which have long since gone the way of the dodo, by the way - and even if Smith's blurred vision had cleared up in less than 15 minutes, which, as it turned out, it didn't, he still would have been considered to have sustained a Grade 1 or mild concussion.
The ACSM consensus statement appears to reject earlier
guidelines (Colorado and AAN) that focused heavily on loss of consciousness and retrograde amnesia (RGA) and to endorse the retrospective approach of the Cantu revised and Prague guidelines in viewing an approach to the return - to - play decision that considered «RGA, PTA, as well as the number and duration of additional signs and symptoms» as «more accurate in predicting severity and outcome ¡ -[and hence] more useful,» and by endorsing an individualized RTP decision, not one «based on a rigid timeline» [like the Colorado, AAN and Cantu Revised G
guidelines (Colorado and
AAN) that focused heavily on loss of consciousness and retrograde amnesia (RGA) and to endorse the retrospective approach of the Cantu revised and Prague
guidelines in viewing an approach to the return - to - play decision that considered «RGA, PTA, as well as the number and duration of additional signs and symptoms» as «more accurate in predicting severity and outcome ¡ -[and hence] more useful,» and by endorsing an individualized RTP decision, not one «based on a rigid timeline» [like the Colorado, AAN and Cantu Revised G
guidelines in viewing an approach to the return - to - play decision that considered «RGA, PTA, as well as the number and duration of additional signs and symptoms» as «more accurate in predicting severity and outcome ¡ -[and hence] more useful,» and by endorsing an individualized RTP decision, not one «based on a rigid timeline» [like the Colorado,
AAN and Cantu Revised
GuidelinesGuidelines)
The
guideline is published in the April 18, 2016, online issue of Neurology ®, the medical journal of the American Academy of Neurology, and will be presented at the 68th
AAN Annual Meeting in Vancouver, Canada, April 15 to 21, 2016.
«Several large, randomized acute pharmacological migraine treatment trials have been conducted since release of the 2000
AAN / AHS
guidelines, so it was important that we update our
guidelines to reflect the latest evidence.»
The authors, who are members of the
Guidelines Section of AHS, updated the acute migraine treatment guidelines published in 2000 by the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) an
Guidelines Section of AHS, updated the acute migraine treatment
guidelines published in 2000 by the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) an
guidelines published in 2000 by the American Academy of Neurology (
AAN) and the AHS.
The AHS and
AAN also recently published joint
guidelines on the prevention of migraine attacks.