Their handling of this issue and
the AGW issue in general has been transparently biased and an affront to responsible journalism.
Not exact matches
I agree mostly with Roger Pielke, Jr. (on this one
issue...);
in general I suspect that for the US, the «rush to tropical coastlines» has, and is likely to continue having a much bigger impact than the
AGW - induced intensity rise.
There are still
issues with the tropical upper - tropospheric hot spot
in the observations, but earlier mismatches between data and models were larger and it was found the observations had errors; plus, that hot spot is not a «fingerprint» for
AGW; it is a
general to warming.