Assessment of most
research (not only climate
research) is much more complex than two «
sides» but that is what consideration of the
AGW hypothesis has devolved to become and, in my opinion, the IPCC Charter is responsible for this.
You address your question to ``... those on the co2
AGW side of the debate», and this confuses me because the IOP is clearly not addressing the science behind climate change in their submission, but rather the behavior of scientists and
research institutions.