Sentences with phrase «apostle at»

Lenn, Mary was available to talk with by the apostles at the time.

Why were the apostles at Pentecost accused of being full of wine when they began speaking in tongues?

The answer is centered in a misunderstanding of what an apostle was in the first place (in the Greco - Roman social context), and is based on a hierarchical understanding that places apostles at the top of the church structure when the New Testament clearly places them at the bottom.

For Orthodox Christians the uncreated light is the visible energies of God — other examples include the burning bush, the light that transfigured both Moses and Jesus, the light that blinded Paul at his conversion and the fire that descended upon the apostles at Pentecost.

What was the attitude of the apostles at the beginning?

Its a premium dating site that allows for all followers of the Apostles at Pentecost to come and date.

These and other artists typically placed the twelve apostles at the dining table as Christ prepared the offering of consecrated bread and wine.

Discover the Twelve Apostles at sunrise and sunset and watch as they change colours and create an impressive ambience.

Unlike Phillip Island it is not possible to get up really close but if you are at the 12 Apostles at the end of the day keep your eyes peeled on the shore below.

There are, in fact, only eight Apostles at the moment, but who knows when the next stretches of cliff will become pillars.

The overnight will let you see the 12 Apostles at sunrise and sunset when the low - angled solar rays breathtakingly change the colors of the limestone rocks and cliffs.

Not exact matches

Squeeze in some time outdoors, be it hiking at Lion's Head or Cape Point, spotting penguins at Boulders Beach, or testing your surfing chops in chichi Camps Bay, home to the legendary Twelve Apostles Hotel.

When the apostle Paul wrote this, it was in a culture of pagan worship where the church at Ephesus was situated.

At the end of John's Gospel, after Jesus» resurrection, He is seated with the apostles.

With that in mind, the prophetess as God's voice, as judge, as apostle, as leader has precedence in the scriptural history of God's people as far back as at least Judges and as recently Acts, to saying nothing of those who have been recognised as particular saints since then (although I'm not RC I don't deny there are people worthy of particular honour).

Everyone was filled with awe at the many wonders and signs performed by the apostles.

the problem is that ppl read the bible thats been translated, if you realy want to know what was said youll need to study hebrew... every letter has a meaning... every word isnt a perfect fit for english,, theres nuances and cultural differences that youll find,,, its a whole new thing to go back and look at the bible through hebrew eyes,,, they arent required to look like us,,, were supposed to look more like them,,, yashua was a jew,,,, all the apostles were jews, yashua was sent to the lost sheep of the house of israel, not the gentiles, paul took it to the gentiles, and he never stopped being and living as a jew, the laws are very viable today, but they do nt give salvation, thats what yashua did...

The apostles themselves did not understand Jesus» statement at Matthew 16:18 to mean that Peter was the rock - mass.

Even though history clearly speaks to Paul dying at the hands of Nero, all the apostles except John being murdered, and early church fathers such as Polycarp being killed by Rome?

The evidence (note the shot at Protestant individualism — culminating in the self - baptism we witness in the wonderful movie THE APOSTLE): He said he was.

With his wife's full knowledge he kept back part of the money for himself, but brought the rest and put it at the apostles» feet.

At Revelation 20:11, 12, we read the apostle John's description of Judgment Day: «I saw a great white throne and the one seated on it.

They tell the others, who still don't believe, but Jesus later appears to all 11 apostles (Judas is persona non grata at this point and / or dead) and rebukes them for not believing Mary Magdalene and the first two apostles who saw him earlier.

This can be seen from carefully looking at Hebrews chapter 4 in the Bible, for the apostle Paul wrote that the «seventh day» or God's «rest» day (Heb 4:1 - 5), was still ongoing some 4000 years after the end of the sixth «creative «day (Gen 1:31), and was far from complete.

At any rate, you haven't addressed how anyone knows how the apostles died, apart from Christian legend.

You have to believe the recorded history provided by the witnesses to it, the apostles Jesus gathered at the start.

And to say that Biblical teachings are invalid because there are other similar beliefs that have older known written sources invalidates the Biblical teachings also should take into consideration that for certain Biblical believers that all those truths whether they are known to have been placed in the Bible first or known thus far to have been placed elsewhere that they believe that they all come via deity who at the beginning of human history on this world dispensed those truths to humanity and that to those who believe in the biblical teachings believe that through time they are more complete than those of other ancient beliefs due to God restoring those truths through revelations given to later prophets like say Moses and other later Old and New Testament prophets and apostles.

At the beginning of the Acts, the apostles are accused of being drunk, so obviously if they weren't believed to be sober in their own day, why should we believe what they wrote even now?

At Matthew 10, in giving detailed instructions to his newly appointed twelve apostles, he said: «As you go preach, saying,» The kingdom of the heavens has drawn near... Into whatever city or village you enter, search out in it is deserving, and stay there till you leave.

(John 20:17) The apostle Peter wrote in about 62 C.E that «he is at God's right hand, for he went his way to heaven; and angels and authorities and powers were made subject to him.»

The apostles refer to it repeatedly in the Bible as the membership of faith at different locations throughout the Mediterranean and asia minor.

You hold as true, the words of the ONE «apostle» who never met Christ at all, indeed had persecuted and killed Christians for years.

At this time, I lean towards the «elder» in Paul's writings to be someone that we would call a fulltime pastor / evangelist / prophet / apostle; and further, assomeone recognized as such by outsiders / non-believers.

I learned this not from a class in feminist studies, but from Jesus — who was brought into the world by a woman whose obedience changed everything; who revealed his identity to a scorned woman at a well; who defended Mary of Bethany as his true disciple, even though women were prohibited from studying under rabbis at the time; who obeyed his mother; who refused to condemn the woman caught in adultery to death; who looked to women for financial and moral support, even after the male disciples abandoned him; who said of the woman who anointed his feet with perfume that «wherever this gospel is preached throughout the world, what she has done will also be told, in memory of her»; who bantered with a Syrophoenician woman, talked theology with a Samaritan woman, and healed a bleeding woman; who appeared first before women after his resurrection, despite the fact that their culture deemed them unreliable witnesses; who charged Mary Magdalene with the great responsibility of announcing the start of a new creation, of becoming the Apostle to the Apostles.

Mosebach deals with the canard, that to be active at Mass we must be physically moving around, by a thoughtful essay that poses the simple but cutting question, «What active role did the apostles play at the Last Supper?»

What is less clear to me is why complementarians like Keller insist that that 1 Timothy 2:12 is a part of biblical womanhood, but Acts 2 is not; why the presence of twelve male disciples implies restrictions on female leadership, but the presence of the apostle Junia is inconsequential; why the Greco - Roman household codes represent God's ideal familial structure for husbands and wives, but not for slaves and masters; why the apostle Paul's instructions to Timothy about Ephesian women teaching in the church are universally applicable, but his instructions to Corinthian women regarding head coverings are culturally conditioned (even though Paul uses the same line of argumentation — appealing the creation narrative — to support both); why the poetry of Proverbs 31 is often applied prescriptively and other poetry is not; why Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob represent the supremecy of male leadership while Deborah and Huldah and Miriam are mere exceptions to the rule; why «wives submit to your husbands» carries more weight than «submit one to another»; why the laws of the Old Testament are treated as irrelevant in one moment, but important enough to display in public courthouses and schools the next; why a feminist reading of the text represents a capitulation to culture but a reading that turns an ancient Near Eastern text into an apologetic for the post-Industrial Revolution nuclear family is not; why the curse of Genesis 3 has the final word on gender relationships rather than the new creation that began at the resurrection.

There are no ethical absolutes for us in the Law or in the teaching of Christ and the apostles, and there is no natural law, at least not one about which any reliable conclusions can be drawn.

At one point you define heresy as departure from the apostles» teaching and at another you define it as departure from historic church teachinAt one point you define heresy as departure from the apostles» teaching and at another you define it as departure from historic church teachinat another you define it as departure from historic church teaching.

In Gethsemane too the Apostles ran away and hid, or at best looked on, when the Lord was taken prisoner.

Then, in a detailed analysis of a paragraph at the end of the letter to the Romans, he demolishes any hope given to the cause of women's ordination by the brief reference to Junias (or Junia), clearly showing we can not know with any certainty the sex of this member of the early church, nor his or her place in relation to the apostles.

Kirk maintains they are necessarily male (and Jewish) because they are «a proleptic [anticipatory] symbol of the coming kingdom», a divine reconstruction of the twelve tribes of Israel, founded on the twelve sons of Jacob; although he adds this does not preclude «the possibility that Jesus has other ends in mind... a church with Peter at its head and the twelve apostles as the foundation stones of its order and authority» (p. 43).

His name always and invariably stands at the top of the list of all the apostles.

At the same time, Francis cites Dei Verbum, the dogmatic constitution on divine revelation, observing that the Church's duty to guard the deposit of faith, which closed with the death of the last apostle, is in «the very nature» of the Church.

Some commentators think that the words with which John records Jesus» death, «He bowed his head and gave up his spirit», were also intended to mean that as he died he handed over the Spirit to the few representative believers who stood at the foot of the cross (John 19:30).10 Luke, in the Acts of the Apostles, separates chronologically what John holds together theologically.

... The Jews (just like the church now) got flippant concerning divorce... I feel Jesus didn't have to mention homosexuality because the Law was clear to any Jew at that time... Paul had to mention it because he was an apostle to the Gentiles who I think were more prone to homosexuality behavior... I'm though not as learned as you... just my thought after 15 years of thinking about this issue... The church has a sacred duty to all... even gays... we need a unified loving answer to give them... but it must be the truth... because only the truth can set us free...

$ 25 At the end of his new book on St. Paul, N. T. Wright invites a comparison between his treatment of the apostle and....

Ziyad b. «Abdullah al - Bakka «i from Muhammad b. Ishaq told me the following: Then the apostle was carried by night from the mosque at Mecca to the Masjid al - Aqsa WHICH IS THE TEMPLE OF AELIA, when Islam had spread in Mecca among the Quraysh and all the tribes.

In fact, the Apostles «advocated this system, not because God had revealed it as the divine will for Christian homes, but because it was the only stable and respectable system anyone knew about» at the time, according to Carol A. Newsom and Sharon H. Ringe of the Women's Bible Commentary.

In his story al - Hasan said: «The apostle and Gabriel went their way until they arrived AT THE TEMPLE AT JERUSALEM»... (Guillaume, pp. 181, 182; bold and capital emphasis ours)

Another example, taken at random: for the Third Sunday after Easter, with a sermon on Acts 5: 27 - 32 and 40 - 41 we get a strong and vivid picture of the Apostles who are now ready to go out into the world and take the Gospel everywhere.