Abortion issues seemed left in the dust as economic concerns drove this year's election, but on Tuesday voters ousted several pro-life Democrats and ushered in fiscal conservatives who tend to oppose abortion.
Not exact matches
My
issue is with your statements that
abortion is a «quick fix» (your words) and that you still
seem to feel that women who have an
abortion do it without exploring other alternatives first.
From Bet: My
issue is with your statements that
abortion is a «quick fix» (your words) and that you still
seem to feel that women who have an
abortion do it without exploring other alternatives first.
Even women
seem to have opted out of the notion of
abortion as a medical
issue.
Perhaps with enough people hammering the
issues of
abortion and gay marriage, Harris is right to direct her attention and effort to other
issues of mercy and justice, but the flavor of the book
seems to downplay the importance of traditional marriage, infant life, and the church's role in mercy ministry.
It
seems to me that the right - wing of this country is more focused on fire and brimstone
issues that divide us like gay marriage and
abortion just so they can avoid the fact that their primary reason for their economic platform is to feed people's greed.
However, the sad truth is that 1) the
issue is much deeper than
abortion which the church needs to address, (ie., fix the root cause) and 2) this
abortion issue does not
seem to resonate appropriately among the believers
Pro-Life Lefties «
Abortion», writes the political director of the Huffington Post UK, «is one of those rare political
issues on which left and right
seem to have swapped ideologies: right - wingers talk of equality, human rights and «defending the innocent», while left - wingers fetishise «choice», selfishness and unbridled individualism.»
I also notice in my experience that most people who claim to be pro-choice who I have talked to are not open to dialog and
seem to deflect with other
issues when talking about
abortion.
And we've seen, when
issues of racial injustice flare up, vocal pro-lifers wonder why civil rights leaders don't
seem as concerned about the injustice of
abortion.
Doesn't it
seem like christians whether conservative or liberal scape goat social
issues like
abortions, gay marriage or contraceptives for really fiscal
issues instead?
Given the latest medical data concerning the distinct characteristics of the fetus and its ability to survive outside the womb at a startlingly early age, it is little wonder that in the past few years several of the denominations that once took a more open position on
abortion have retreated somewhat: the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) is now studying the
issue; in a 1980 statement on social principles, the UMC moved to a more qualified position; the Episcopal Church and the recently formed Evangelical Lutheran Church in America
seem to be in the process of toning down their earlier positions (or those of a predecessor body) The Lutherans defeated a resolution in their 1989 Assembly which would have been consistent with the liberal position of the LCA predecessor body, and a 1988 Lutheran - Episcopal dialogue report refers to the fetus as «embryonic humanity» with claims on society.
Similarly, with respect to
issues such as
abortion, fetal experimentation, and euthanasia, many today deny what an earlier generation and, it would
seem, most Americans today take to be undeniable.
I took the first step 26 years ago, and it would
seem that the
issue of
abortion kind of falls into the arguments I am hearing related to Dominic's thoughts.
He came out against middle - class tax increases, said he now supported the mid-1990s welfare reform, and he made an effort to
seem like an
abortion moderate who struggled with the moral complexity of the
issue.
That
seems to me the same
issue as the
abortion decision, except that the unborn child has a great deal longer to live if you don't press that particular button.
«I suppose,» he said, «it was because we had been made to understand that the
abortion issue was so important to the women in our lives, and it just did not
seem that important to most of us.»
Now I find it odd that it is some of our more Evangelical Baptists who are open and accepting — primarily, it
seems to me, because of their agreement on ethical
issues, particularly
abortion.
The general trend of Americans becoming more socially liberal has not translated to the
abortion issue in the same way, and a major cause of that, it
seems, is the emotivist objection to
abortion.
With many of these
issues, there did
seem to be a clear Christian position — on the
abortion of unborn children, for instance, and on the need to stabilize families.
The mailer though certainly
seems to at least make an attempt to invoke the
issue of «choice» — a common euphemism often ascribed to
abortion rights.
But if the RNC — officially neutral — tilted toward Lazio, the officially neutral Republican Governors Association
seems to be tilting the other way, brushing off concerns about Levy's Democratic past and liberal views on
abortion and other
issues, and buying the impression among many New York observers that Levy might have a real shot against Andrew Cuomo.
Given the current election year controversies over
abortion and the ideas of separation of church and state, this book
seems to mirror the current
issues.
Although some Liberals
seem intent to capitalize on the
abortion issue, most would rather not have an election over it.