Sentences with phrase «abortion laws do»

Clearly, strict abortion laws do not stop abortions from happening, but can make them less safe by causing delay and restricting access.

Not exact matches

If the law forbids some types of abortions, sometimes it is not clear what types of abortions fall under what category, and so they decide not to do it all.»

But Kasich did sign into law a measure banning abortions after 20 weeks — another controversial regulation that could potentially brush up against previous court rulings, even though Kasich cited Supreme Court precedent for his veto of the «heartbeat» legislation.

Did they see similar declines when they liberalized their abortion laws?

The number one issue is abortion on every agenda, yet this is an issue which is not stopped by legislation, it is stopped by attacking poverty, by increasing love for children, by accepting everything a sinner does — instead the goal is secular laws, shaming women with ultrasounds.

And, of course, they whine like crazy when we don't build their dogma into our laws, like the ones on abortion or gay marriage.

Regarding Amy Wax's discussion of abortion and child support: As long as the law guarantees to a woman the absolute, unqualified and unconditional right, regardless of age or status, to give birth anonymously (as some 400 French women do every year, down from 4,000 in 1947),....

Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said the Democrats» sweeping healthcare reform law does not fund abortions, and that no president's administration has since the Hyde Amendment passed more than 30 years ago.

I don't think you can be a pro-life feminist and argue that women need to be condescended to and «informed of what they're doing» as though they don't already know (cf. laws that institute mandatory waiting periods so they can «think it over,» which puts an untenable burden on those who have to travel for abortion procedures and do not have the money to do so).

The slope of the decline in maternal mortality «did not appear to be altered by the change in abortion law,» according to the researchers.

Further, Gov. Cuomo, along with many others today, do not simply «deal with the law as it is» but energetically work to keep the law as it is with respect to the unlimited abortion license.

And no I don't believe in abortion, and I don't believe the laws should protect and favor the wealthy, and big corporations either.

Yet, of course, Neuhaus did not allow that grace to Mario Cuomo or others who say they are «personally opposed» to abortion but have to deal with the law as it is.

Does this stop Christians from tying up the supreme court with law suits concerning school prayer, abortion, gay marriage, or numerous other absurdities?

Don't want an abortion, don't have one but don't think your personal belief trumps the laws that you must bide by in this world and please don't think they deserve respect when obviously they are being use to step on other peoples rights to freedom over their own body.

Spain's new abortion law, as LifeSiteNews reported in an earlier dispatch, «abolishes penalties for all abortions during the first fourteen weeks of pregnancy» and «allows minors to obtain abortions without parental permission, although they must first inform their parents of their intention to do so.»

Abortion should be law for all a woman is doing when she aborts is terminating God's building being built.

And the truth of the matter, most slugs making noise about abortion are only concerned with tax money being used, which in of itself clearly shows they do not know anything about the law, and the use of tax funds for abortion, because it is already illegal.

I don't care for abortion but under the laws of the land... women can have them.

Anika Rahman, Director of the International Program for CRLP, claimed, in a letter to the Washington Times (August 31, 2001), that «our lawsuit does not assert that the right to abortion is a principle of international customary law.»

On these issues, Catholics enter covenants and have shared experiences and intuitions with Jews, secular rationalists and liberal Protestants who do not find the case for outlawing abortion to be part of their reading of natural law.

Why else do they spend so much time and money on campaigns to overturn abortion laws, and fighting proper s.ex ed in high schools?

... not to mention the fact that «murder» is a legal term and the law does not consider abortion murder; you have, once again; proven abortion ≠ murder.

«All they're asking for is a narrow exemption from the law that says they don't have to provide drugs they believe cause abortions,» Hobby Lobby attorney Kyle Duncan, a general counsel for the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, told CNN affiliate KFOR in November.

But from this point, it does not necessarily follow that I would have the law try to protect the embryo at every moment, or seek an «absolute prohibition» on abortion.

As I said in my own piece, people of my persuasion would do handstands if we could enact Wilson's policy today and have the law restrict abortions beyond eight to ten weeks.

Likewise, it either requires malicious intent or outright stupidity to claim that the health - care law funds abortions, when it very clearly does not.

Listen I keep seeing bumper stickers like «you can't be both Catholic and pro-choice» these are not reflective of my faith, theser are slogans made for propaganda, I have 2 beautiful children and I have never been on a position where abortion could even play a part, but it is a legal option to the public at large; this being said even the bible calls for us to be good citizens, and to obey the law, I believe that this is a matter that belongs with the family and not the state; no matter how we criminalize abortion, they will not stop, but people will go under - ground and more fatalities will occur, I rather see the government placing incentives on more conseling for these expectant mothers and more outreach done at church levels, to reduce the debate to a single slogan is dangerous and will not accomplish the ultimately goal of preventing abortions my two humble cents

But the pope did not declare Nazi Germany or the Soviet Union illegitimate, despite the genocide and mass murders, which were surely as much violations of the moral law as abortion.

Let there be no mistake about the impact of the Roe and Doe decisions: they did not «liberalize» abortion law; they abolished abortion law in all fifty states.

If abortion is the litmus test of a moral law that can not be violated by positive law, then all of the Western democracies that legalize abortion» and do so by the legislative rather than judicial process» are illegitimate.

Very restrictive abortion laws go against the consciences of many, but the lack of such laws does not require behavior that goes against the consciences of others.

Overturning a lower court's decision that ruled that the laws unconstitutionally limited access to abortion in the state, New Orleans - based 5th Circuit Court of Appeals judges wrote, «on its face does not impose an undue burden on the life and health of a woman.»

This is why I don't think most Christians who demand laws against abortion are sincere about it being about «respect for human life».

Just as abortion, gay rights, and baseball doping will have no effect on the economy, illegal invaders, the wars we are locked in, or the housing market, neither will the candidate's religious beliefs (counting any religion that advocates the murder of others, the subjugating of women, and the establishment of it's own set of laws — though I have no idea or what major religion would do so...).

What I did was refer to some state laws, undeniably on the statute books, that allow abortion in many or all cases.

I think the new law actually does mention abortions.

Assertions, whether from treaty - monitoring bodies, or abortion - promoting organizations, that abortion is a part of health do not reflect the law, nor that they are not the authors of international law.

Birth control and abortion is common practice; the hospitals can provide «sinner buildings» where the doctors and staff who don't have a moral problem providing such services can do so and keep the hospital in compliance with the law..

I sure as heck do NOT want religious people to attack the laws allowing abortion to remain legal.

But English law doesn't exclude that as a reason for getting abortion, because the law only requires two doctors to certify that the woman will be harmed mentally or physically by having the child.

«Research has shown that life - affirming laws do have an impact on lowering the number of abortions, and with all the life - affirming laws passed since 2010, we have a reason to celebrate the number of lives saved and women protected as legislators worked to defend them from a predatory and rarely accountable abortion industry,» AUL Acting President Clark Forsythe said in a written statement.

Here the Pope says yes: «When it is not possible to overturn or completely abrogate a pro-abortion law, an elected official, whose absolute personal opposition to procured abortion was well known, could licitly support proposals aimed at limiting the harm done by such a law and at lessening its negative consequences at the level of general opinion and public morality.»

Said St. Augustine: «The law does not provide that the act [abortion] pertains to homicide.

After all, the Court could have come down, as the German Constitutional Court did in a 1975 decision interpreting Germany's Basic Law, in precisely the opposite way — invalidating a legislatively enacted liberalization of abortion.

Maybe he is saying that those who truly believe abortion is wrong should do less to make themselves feel good (pushing for anti-abortion laws that just drive abortion underground) and more to actually decrease abortion (push to make birth control more available and to improve the economic situation of the poor).

If the Court does not claim to act merely in its own name, but for the common good and the rule of law, how then should citizens regard the effort to link abortion with the legitimacy of the Court itself and thus, it would seem, with the legitimacy of our current political regime?

They want «In God We Trust» on our money (1954), they want evolution banned from schools while allowing a REVISED pledge of allegiance that originally did not include the phrase «under God», they want laws that reflect Christian morality (Abortion, same s3x marriage, etc.), and they treat as outcasts anyone who doesn't align with their particular religious view.

Finally, HOBBY LOBBY's attorney said, «All they're asking for is a narrow exemption from the law that says they don't have to provide drugs they believe cause abortions.»

The professors don't like abortion, 70 per cent deeming it immoral when a married woman resorts to it to stop having children; but only 44 per cent want laws against it.