Sentences with phrase «about being an author when»

10 Things I Wish I Had Known About Being an Author When I first started writing my author blog (about four and a half years ago), I had

Not exact matches

For example, if you were an author writing a book about how to drive traffic to a website, you need to find an example of how your business suffered when it didn't have traffic to its site.
When author and blogger Mark Manson was about to get married, he reached out for some advice.
If you're unsure about what your goal for the book is, read this piece about the mistakes that authors make when framing the results they are looking for, and how to better frame.
A book about the prince written by US author Sally Bedell Smith claims that when travelling to America in first class — naturally to reduce his carbon footprint — he reportedly complained that the upper class deck was «incredibly uncomfortable.»
«When we have to think about our failures - that puts us in a negative mood and research has shown that when people are in a negative mood state, they tend to indulge to make themselves feel better,» lead author Hristina Nikolova explaiWhen we have to think about our failures - that puts us in a negative mood and research has shown that when people are in a negative mood state, they tend to indulge to make themselves feel better,» lead author Hristina Nikolova explaiwhen people are in a negative mood state, they tend to indulge to make themselves feel better,» lead author Hristina Nikolova explained.
«When people are surprised on Twitter, they are going to tweet about it and that's how things can spread very quickly,» says O'Neil's boss, Dave Kerpen, CEO of Likable Local, and author of Likeable Business (McGraw - Hill, 2012).
The book is particularly helpful, says Branson, because the authors explain how to build and successfully channel new power: «It's a useful lens to use when thinking about how business has changed, how to spread ideas or start a movement, or create change.»
«Relative deprivation is an idea that says that when we make judgments about ourselves, we judge ourselves next to our immediate peers — people like us in the same room as us — not to the world at large,» Gladwell said in a recent interview with author Daniel H. Pink.
When Steve Case, the billionaire co-founder of AOL, first met J. D. Vance, author of «Hillbilly Elegy,» the best - selling book about the industrial decline of the Midwest, Mr. Case told him, «I really love the book but there is a part of it I don't love.»
Futurist, change management specialist and «X: The Experience When Business Meets Design» author Brian Solis sits down with The Young Turks» Cenk Uygur to talk about the past, present and future and how more and faster change is coming, and the only question is whether you're going to be a part of that change or a victim of it.
About the Author: Sam has been investing his own money since 1995 when he first opened an online brokerage account.
Understand the Annuity Product - In Plain Language Annie Logue of the Root of All, Chicago on the Cheap, and author of several Money and Investing Dummies books about asks; «When are annuity investment products a good idea?»
«When we interviewed the insurers for our report, it was in late 2017, so we were not able to fully capture how insurers currently would feel about these market stabilization proposals that are in the news this week,» said Sabrina Corlette, research professor at the Center on Health Insurance Reforms at Georgetown University's Health Policy Institute and one of the authors of the study.
While this strategy works just fine for large publishers that already have established brands and get thousands of shares on any new article they publish (such as Mashable or TechCrunch), a more pragmatic approach is needed for just about every other business.It's true that getting quality inbound links starts with great content on your client's website, but the missing link is getting journalists, contributors, authors, and editors at quality publications to become aware of that content so that they can link to it when writing relevant stories / articles.
In my experience, the phrase usually pops up when an author wants to write about a topic just because he finds it interesting, but feels like readers won't care about the topic unless he can convince them it's somehow important.
I mean seriously, if it wasn't for those that were non-Christians in Europe, such as the Enlightenment authors, who constantly wrote about how wrong these acts were then maybe they would not have ended when they did.
The truths of Genesis 6 - 8 (and especially 6:7, 13, 17; 7:23) can be understood differently when we grasp the Scriptural and cultural contexts in which these texts were written, what other Old Testament authors had to say about the flood, and also what the Apostle Peter writes about it in his second letter.
CNN: My take: «Atheist» isn't a dirty word, congresswoman Chris Stedman, author of «Faitheist: How an Atheist Found Common Ground with the Religious,» writes that when Rep. Kyrsten Sinema's campaign said «the terms non-theist, atheist or non-believer are not befitting of her life's work or personal character» it implied that there is something unfavorable about nonbelievers.
I re-read a book recently, and the author wrote about how she was supposed to speak at an event, and when she asked which topic they would like to here her expound upon, they said, well, just tell us what is saving your life right now.
I agree that the author receiving a «like» feels better about the feedback than they do when receiving a «dislike», but the same can be said for full comments of agreement or disagreement.
When you read in the Bible about proclaiming Jesus as Lord, following Jesus, taking up your cross, eternal reward, inheriting the Kingdom, life in the Spirit, faithful living, and on and on and on, the author who wrote that text was primarily thinking of how we should live as followers of Jesus so that we can experience the life God meant for us to live.
As author Penny Lernoux has noted: «When the Alliance for Progress was finally buried at the end of the 1960s, about the only thing that the Latin American countries had to show for it was an enormous foreign debt: 19.3 billion dollars compared to 8.8 billion in 1961 when the program was launched» (Cry of the People [Doubleday], p. 2When the Alliance for Progress was finally buried at the end of the 1960s, about the only thing that the Latin American countries had to show for it was an enormous foreign debt: 19.3 billion dollars compared to 8.8 billion in 1961 when the program was launched» (Cry of the People [Doubleday], p. 2when the program was launched» (Cry of the People [Doubleday], p. 211).
Maybe the Holy Spirit is at work around the world to bring multiple authors and pastors and theologians to similar ideas about similar things all at once, and so when I read something in someone else's book that sounds a lot like something I have written, but they don't give me credit, it is not that they «borrowed» from me, but because both of us were listening to what the Spirit has been whispering to minds all over the world.
The first, ascribed to Peter, exists in part in a papyrus fragment which describes the crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus and breaks off when the author says, «But I, Simon Peter, and Andrew my brother, took our nets and went away to the sea, and with us there was Levi, son of Alphaeus, whom the Lord...» This gospel was known to and criticized by Serapion, bishop of Antioch, about 190.
So it was with great excitement when I learned that one of my favorite authors who writes about the church, was publishing a book about Jesus.
The author reviews a book by Stanley Hauerwas: When Hauerwas asserts that liberal Christians are those who take «humans, not God, as the center of Christian faith,» or when he says that one of «the most cherished conceits of modernity» is that «humans are the measure of all that is,» he reveals that he has not thought hard enough about what liberalism and modernity mean to their proponeWhen Hauerwas asserts that liberal Christians are those who take «humans, not God, as the center of Christian faith,» or when he says that one of «the most cherished conceits of modernity» is that «humans are the measure of all that is,» he reveals that he has not thought hard enough about what liberalism and modernity mean to their proponewhen he says that one of «the most cherished conceits of modernity» is that «humans are the measure of all that is,» he reveals that he has not thought hard enough about what liberalism and modernity mean to their proponents.
He added that the author's comments were «dismissive of children being harmed», saying it was «naivety at best and, at worst, a dismissal of understanding that when we talk about indecent images of children, we're talking about a crime scene where children have been abused.»
But when the Rev. Paul F.M. Zahl read several of King's novels, he learned something new about the author: There's a lot of faith behind his fright.
I re-read a book recently, and the author wrote about how she was supposed to speak at an event, and when she asked which topic they would like to here her expound upon, they said, well, just tell us what...
It's sad when the author of this story makes it sound like she knows what she is talking about and the unknowing person believes that the writer is correct.
I vividly recall being crushed for about a week when I found out Stephen King (the author) was a believer.
This does not help us when we try to figure out what a Biblical author is talking about when he writes about «baptism.»
The United States is one of a dwindling number of nations unenthusiastic about the application of world law when applied to its own conduct, but for reasons supplied by the author, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights is still a tool for people of conscience to use in the struggle for a world more respectful of human dignity.
talks so confidently about the inerrant, perfect, infallible character of the original Autographs of the Bible when no one has seen one for more than eighteen centuries Moreover, it is clear that originally no one thought the wording was perfect since copyists, translators, and authors had little fear of changing it.
So when scholars write about the Old Testament, they primarily seek to understand only what the original human authors and original human audience understood when the text was written.
Here is a page that addresses some of the many lies by DB: http://tfninsider.org/2012/03/02/more-zombie-lies-from-david-barton/ (This was the author whose book about Jefferson was yanked by his publisher when it came to light that is was chock full of misinformation.)
However, we should recognize that when we do so, we are speaking quite differently than the biblical authors who naively thought they were talking about actual events.
The impression you will get from the book is that the authors are simply teaching what Jesus, Paul, and John really thought and cared about, when in reality, what you will be getting is a strong Calvinistic interpretation of the New Testament.
As Yves Simon and Heinrich Rommen long ago demonstrated, there is room for disagreement within the tradition of natural law about how one envisions the role played by God as the author of human nature, or about the tortuous problem of culpability when there is deeply rooted perversity of basic inclinations.
My own first reaction when I heard about the USPS honor was to recall a January 1954 letter to Robert and Sally Fitzgerald, with whom the young author had lived for a brief period.
Was this author equally appalled about the prayer breakfast earlier this month, when President Obama tried to use biblical phrases like «for unto whom much is given, much shall be required» and «love thy neighbor as thyself» out of context as justification for his tax and economic policies?
When the author talks about interpretation of an ancient book, he means to take literally the scripture the way you are putting.
When we read about Paul struggling mightily so that Christians in small churches will learn to live in Christian harmony, perhaps we see an alternative vision of church — one in which all the theological muscle of the author of Philippians is marshaled merely to get Euodia and Syntyche to get along (Phil.
The author's degrees are in philosophy, not theology, and I think it shows one of his biases when he goes on about where his Mormon counterparts got their degrees.
About 3000 years ago, the author of the book of Sirach had this to say: When, in the beginning, the Lord created human beings, he left them free to do as they wished (free will)....
I remember when I was researching the first flop, I came across Gesine's (the recipe author's) web site, where she happened to be giving a polite but stern lecture to others with the same question, about the importance of using her recommended ingredients.
Also the recipe author says not to worry about any little lumps in the cake batter - I ignored the small ones and it is notable when eating the cake in an unpleasant way (texture-wise, as I like my cake to be smooth and fluffy) so I would recommend making sure it is lump free before pouring into pans.
This is an abstract of an observational study that can establish only association but does not prove causality; this is confirmed by the authors themselves in the press release when they state ``... so we can not say that low kilojoule beverage cause these problems... there may be other factors about people who drink more diet drinks that could explain the connection.»
One of our goals as authors of Lunchbox Solutions is to educate people, because it is only when we are educated about nutrition — and the lack of nutrition in our foods — that we have the ability to make informed choices about our health.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z