Not exact matches
Over the past several years Florida has attempted substantial reforms of its struggling public school system, the fourth - largest in the country and one that consistently ranks close to the bottom on
academic indicators,
including high - school graduation rates and scores on the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP).
There is a strong desire to expand beyond just
academic indicators —
including a measure of growth is very important — but
including things that are not direct learning outcomes and focus more on environment and other input measures blurs the vision on what we want students to know and be able to do.
ESSA also requires state accountability systems to
include «a measure of student growth, if determined appropriate by the State; or another valid and reliable statewide
academic indicator that allows for meaningful differentiation in school performance.»
ESSA requires state accountability systems to
include an
indicator of
academic achievement «as measured by proficiency on the annual assessments.»
In addition to four
academic indicators, the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) requires state accountability systems to
include one other
indicator, such as student engagement, educator engagement, access to and completion of advanced coursework, postsecondary readiness, or school climate and safety.
At least one
indicator of school success or student support — such as attendance, school climate, or access to AP or other advanced coursework — must be
included in measuring school performance (though
academic factors must still make up at least half of all
indicators for accountability purposes).
Annually measures, for all students and separately for each subgroup of students, the following
indicators:
Academic achievement (which, for high schools, may include a measure of student growth, at the State's discretion); for elementary and middle schools, a measure of student growth, if determined appropriate by the State, or another valid and reliable statewide academic indicator; for high schools, the four - year adjusted cohort graduation rate and, at the State's discretion, the extended - year adjusted cohort graduation rate; progress in achieving English language proficiency for English learners; and at least one valid, reliable, comparable, statewide indicator of school quality or student succ
Academic achievement (which, for high schools, may
include a measure of student growth, at the State's discretion); for elementary and middle schools, a measure of student growth, if determined appropriate by the State, or another valid and reliable statewide
academic indicator; for high schools, the four - year adjusted cohort graduation rate and, at the State's discretion, the extended - year adjusted cohort graduation rate; progress in achieving English language proficiency for English learners; and at least one valid, reliable, comparable, statewide indicator of school quality or student succ
academic indicator; for high schools, the four - year adjusted cohort graduation rate and, at the State's discretion, the extended - year adjusted cohort graduation rate; progress in achieving English language proficiency for English learners; and at least one valid, reliable, comparable, statewide
indicator of school quality or student success; and
The «Secondary
Academic Indicators»
include a bunch more value added metrics (test scores), college admissions test participation rate, dual enrollment credits, industry credentials, honors diplomas awarded, AP participation rate, AP score (more test scores), IB participate rate, IB score (more tests), College / Career - Ready Assessment (another test?)
«Measuring Up» covers several key
indicators of the state of higher education,
including academic preparation for college in high...
States must use the same n - size for all accountability purposes, ensuring that a different n - size can not be selected for
including English learners in the English language proficiency
indicator than for the
Academic Achievement
indicator or Graduation Rate
indicator.
ACCOUNTABILITY: Starting in 2017 - 18, the new accountability system, in accordance with ESSA, will
include academic and school quality / student success
indicators.
The nine categories
include: goals, standards and assessments, accountability
indicators,
academic progress, all students, identifying schools, supporting schools, exiting improvement status, and continuous improvement.
I was encouraged this week to learn that ESSA — the new American education law — that replaced NCLB
includes language that opens the door beyond
academic testing to
include «multiple measures of student learning and progress, along with other
indicators of student success...» Education Week notes that sprinkled throughout the law are references to an instructional strategy that has enormous potential for reaching learners with diverse needs.
The new CA Dashboard is multi-measure and
includes not only
academic indicators (i.e. SBAC, grad rates) but also
indicators of student climate (i.e. suspension rates).
View data — state assessments, national assessments, local measures,
including both
academic and behavioral
indicators — from multiple disparate systems to provide real - time insight, and enable action to be taken when needed.
Pennsylvania's proposed
indicators for federal accountability
include a greater emphasis on
academic growth, career readiness benchmarks, chronic absenteeism, and extended - year graduation rates for federal accountability purposes.
Under ESSA, state accountability plans have to
include four
academic indicators.
In 2005, Governor Rick Perry passed an executive order that provided for the creation of a system of college - readiness
indicators,
including the reporting of education remediation rates among college students and the creation of an electronic
academic records system to facilitate the transfer of high school transcripts between school districts and between districts and institutions of higher education.
The federal law that replaces the No Child Left Behind Act requires states» accountability systems to
include at least one «nonacademic»
indicator of «school quality or student success» that «allows for meaningful differentiation in school performance» and «is valid, reliable, comparable, and statewide» alongside
academic data (Ujifusa, 2016).
Students who completed social - emotional learning interventions fared better than their peers who didn't participate on a variety of
indicators —
including academic performance, social skills, and avoiding negative behaviors like drug use, finds the analysis, which examined follow - up data from dozens of published studies on specific interventions.
Eight schools in the east Denver area —
including Denver Discovery School, Hill Campus of Arts and Sciences and George Washington High School — did not meet expectations for
academic gaps, but none lost a green rating based on the
indicator alone.
Each state's accountability plans need to
include four
academic indicators as well as a fifth
indicator that may come from a group of suggested areas that
include school culture and climate as well as student and educator engagement.
The fifth
indicator, vaguely titled «other
academic indicators» is 10 % and
includes graduation, promotion, and attendance rates.
These provisions require school districts to compile and
include on school report cards various career - ready
indicators and
include «success sequence» information in
academic and career planning services.
States will now have the responsibility of designing an accountability framework incorporating and giving the most weight to
academic factors,
including student performance on state assessments and high school graduation rates, in addition to state - chosen
indicators of school quality or student success, which can
include measures of educator engagement and school climate / safety.
Department officials said that while Delaware's plan
includes science as an
academic indicator, it appears to
include only reading and math as
indicators.
Together, results from these three assessments will be
included along with at least one other
academic indicator chosen by the state to count more than other
indicators in statewide accountability systems.
States are required to establish new accountability systems that
include annual test scores, graduation rates for high schools, an additional
academic indicator for pre-secondary schools and a measure of how well English learners are achieving proficiency.
In addition, for the first time, the 2018 school profiles
include a «High
Academic Growth» indicator for 54 public district and charter schools that have significantly exceeded the norm for academic growth over the most recent three - year period in both math and English language arts (ELA) on the Pennsylvania Value Added Assessment System
Academic Growth»
indicator for 54 public district and charter schools that have significantly exceeded the norm for
academic growth over the most recent three - year period in both math and English language arts (ELA) on the Pennsylvania Value Added Assessment System
academic growth over the most recent three - year period in both math and English language arts (ELA) on the Pennsylvania Value Added Assessment System (PVAAS).
May a State
include other measures within the
Academic Achievement
indicator, such as achievement on the State's science assessment?
A State may, however,
include other statewide achievement - related measures, such as results on statewide science assessments or student growth for elementary and middle schools, as an
Academic Progress or School Quality or Student Success
indicator.
The only measures a State may
include within its
Academic Achievement indicator in addition to the required measure of student performance on the statewide reading / language arts and mathematics assessments under ESEA [Education and Secondary Education Act, of which ESSA is the latest version] section 1111 (b)(2)(B)(v)(I) are the two optional measures: (1) an achievement index or similar measure of student performance in reading / language arts and mathematics at multiple academic achievement levels above or below proficient (see question B - 10 and B - 11); and (2) measures of student growth in reading / language arts and mathematics for high schools (see questions B - 14 and
Academic Achievement
indicator in addition to the required measure of student performance on the statewide reading / language arts and mathematics assessments under ESEA [Education and Secondary Education Act, of which ESSA is the latest version] section 1111 (b)(2)(B)(v)(I) are the two optional measures: (1) an achievement index or similar measure of student performance in reading / language arts and mathematics at multiple
academic achievement levels above or below proficient (see question B - 10 and B - 11); and (2) measures of student growth in reading / language arts and mathematics for high schools (see questions B - 14 and
academic achievement levels above or below proficient (see question B - 10 and B - 11); and (2) measures of student growth in reading / language arts and mathematics for high schools (see questions B - 14 and B - 15).
Indicators of
academic achievement
included test scores, grades,
academic awards and honors, and observations of education professionals.
Academic and engagement - related
indicators of readiness
include student performance with respect to attendance, credit accumulation, course performance (grade point average and demonstration of proficiencies in context), performance on summative assessments, competitive course - taking patterns (Advanced Placement [AP], International Baccalaureate [IB], and career technical education options), and course completion.
In addition to
academic achievement, the index
includes a first in the nation — the use of social, emotional learning and school climate
indicators.
Historically,
indicators including academic proficiency rates and graduation rates have widely varying performance from school to school, while
indicators such as attendance rates typically have the same performance across all schools.
And although some of the measured
academic differences to peers without preschool do shrink over time, there is strong evidence of meaningful, long - term positive impacts of preschool on important
indicators including high school graduation, health, employment, crime, and other outcomes.
The state board will also provide guidelines districts can use as they collect data for local
indicators,
including information that reflects parent engagement, implementation of the new
academic standards, and the availability of quality educators, instructional materials and facilities.
2 Title IV, Part F, Subpart 2 — Community Support for School Success Full Service Community Schools program The bill also contains provisions that advance the community schools strategy,
including the requirement for
indicators beyond
academics in state and district accountability systems; supportive programs
including Promise Neighborhoods and 21st Century Community Learning Centers; and a new set of tools and resources to boost results - focused school - community partnerships for young people's success,
including integrated student supports, needs assessments, and professional development for educators to work more effectively with families and communities.
The new system centers on six state
indicators, increases the state's focus on equity, and
includes valuable measures of both
academics and a school's learning environment.
«While
academic outcome
indicators are important, it is equally important to
include indicators of student and school conditions that predict outcomes, so that educators have information to use for diagnostic purposes and improvement decisions,» she wrote.
Participants will be representative of the characteristics and diversity of student bodies,
including those students identified through early warning
indicators (e.g., at risk of losing
academic progress, becoming disengaged from school, etc.).
Participants will be representative of the characteristics and diversity of student bodies,
including those students identified through early warning
indicators (e.g., at risk of losing
academic progress, becoming disengaged from school).
CEA believes this «other» 22.5 % should
include non-standardized multiple
indicators of student
academic growth.
For elementary and middle schools, these
indicators must
include: test scores in Reading and Math, English language learner proficiency, at least one
academic measure (such as a growth goal), and one non-
academic measure.
Under ESSA, states must hold schools accountable for student performance in English / language arts (ELA) and mathematics, plus a second
academic indicator, which could
include:
Students who completed social - emotional learning interventions fared better than their peers who didn't participate on a variety of
indicators —
including academic performance, social skills, and avoiding negative behaviors like drug use, finds the analysis, which examined follow - up data from dozens of published studies on specific interventions.
The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) requires state accountability systems to
include indicators of «school quality and student success» in addition to
indicators of
academic outcomes.