Accepted answer seems to imply (without evidence to prove that implication) that school funding disparity causes school districts to be better or worse.
Not exact matches
Furthermore, they
seem happy to
accept one unanswered question in return for being able to use God to
answer any number of other questions, at least until better
answers can be found through science and reason.
I am using the term «dialectic» in its ancient and etymological sense, and it
seems appropriate to describe the process by this word; for instead of an aprioristic, deductive method of procedure, the process was one of
answering questions and objections as they arose, not in anticipation, and not as the unfolding, more geometrico, of a system implicit within a body of axioms or first principles which one needed only
accept and then all the rest followed logically to the final Q.E.D..
Unfortunately, many people
seem to have a problem
accepting that they shouldn't persecute others based on their subjective
answer to an objectively unanswerable question.
You
seem to want me to «study» what the
accepted answers are, according to you, where I prefer to study in order to find the actual, correct
answers.
A good response I reckon, but Wenger was also asked about the issue of fans staying away and instead of
accepting that it was a protest, his
answer seemed to suggest that it was only because there was not much riding on these games that so many seats were empty.
He
seemed to
accept that
answer.
So the parent's mindset
seems to be, «If you really understood what I was saying, you wouldn't talk back to me — you'd
accept my
answer.»
Although I would have preferred an
answer referencing the Democrat's 2010 efforts, it
seems as if such an organization did not actually exist; so I am
accepting this
answer.
I'll let Mr. Coren
answer this one: «I
accept the «preventive safety» reasons for tail docking, but worry that the communication deficit, which
seems to be a consequence, is significant.»
You make trivial web searches to trawl for anything that
seems to support your stance then report your findings here as though they refuted the facts: e.g. in
answer to my pointing out that the Russian Academy of Sciences refuses to
accept AGW, you wrote to me «Here, you are just flat out wrong.
Seems like the short
answer is people
accept what they are told, and stop thinking for themselves.
In any case, they
seem to have
accepted the
answer.