Sentences with phrase «access scholarly publishers»

Since the UK Research Councils announced their signatures, 17 additional organizations have signed the declaration, including the Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association, the Brazilian Institute of Information in Science and Technology, and the IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele.

Not exact matches

This could «reduce the risk to publishers of moving to an open - access business model,» says Stuart Shieber, who heads Harvard's Office for Scholarly Communication and is one of the drivers behind the initiative.

A broad consensus on the need to enable public access to all U.S. federal research emerged in a report published in January by the Scholarly Publishing Roundtable, a panel of librarians, academic leaders and publishers convened last June by the OSTP and the House Committee on Science and Technology.

Jeffrey Beall, a librarian at the University of Colorado, Denver, offers a comprehensive list of potentially predatory scholarly open - access publishers, as Redfield points out.

Ingram's OASIS platform customers now have access to an expanded selection of scholarly, frontlist and award - winning e-book titles from leading publishers through the collaboration.

The metadata librarian in question, Jeffrey Beall, has been featured in prominent journals and newspapers for his work on his site, Scholarly Open Access, which exposes publishers and journals who may be operating under false pretenses or bad business practices.

Beall's List: Potential, possible, or probable predatory scholarly open - access publishers....

The first thing to note with Tri-Agency Policy is that it considerably abridges the author and publisher's right to restrict access, limiting it to twelve months rather fifty years after the author's death (whether the author retains the copyright or assigns it to the publisher, which is often a condition for publication in scholarly publishing).

To digitize collections and sell the product in ways that fail to guarantee wide access would be to repeat the mistake that was made when publishers exploited the market for scholarly journals, but on a much greater scale, for it would turn the Internet into an instrument for privatizing knowledge that belongs in the public sphere.

And what the publishers have made clear, despite this call for respecting others» needs, is their willingness to criminalize, in effect, the scholarly activities of those downloading the million papers a week to which they have no other access (or perhaps none as convenient), and those, among the 13 million people on ResearchGate, who have posted copies of their own (published) work.

Barriers to access — including traditional means of communicating and publishing scholarly research, aggravated by traditional tenure evaluation practices, and especially publishers» restrictive copyright licensing practices — are increasingly unacceptable in an online, born - digital world.