The Commission therefore argued that this information fell within the exception of article 4 (2) third indent of Regulation 1049/2001 (the Public
Access to Documents Regulation).
In this case, the Court found that ClientEarth could not rely on the Aarhus Convention to challenge the Public
Access to Documents Regulation (Regulation 1049/2001) in order to obtain commissioned studies on compliance by Member States with EU environmental law in the context of infringement procedures.
The crucial point here was therefore whether the Public
Access to Documents Regulation was incompatible with the Aarhus Convention because infringement proceedings did not fall under the exception of article 4 (4)(c) of the Aarhus Convention.
Not exact matches
Documents obtained this weekend through the
access to information reveal that these arguments were being made despite the vehement objections of the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA), the agency that enforces tariff
regulations.
Simbli's one - of - a-kind suite of six integrated modules for meetings, strategic plans, board policies and
regulations, board / leader evaluations, communications, and
documents brings all of the board's key governing
documents online in one easy -
to -
access, convenient location.
This
document brings report the key messages that emerged from the Third International Off - grid Renewable Energy Conference (IOREC 2016), including the importance of (1) mainstreaming off - grid renewable energy in national rural electrification strategies, (2) creating an ecosystem
to accelerate deployment, (3) designing dedicated policies and
regulations for the off - grid sector, (4) unlocking capital for energy
access, (5) identifying the right business models for deploying off - grid renewables, (6) innovating
to improve accessibility, reliability and range of electricity services, (7) strengthening the sustainability of energy
access efforts and maximizing benefits and (8) harnessing the cross-sector development impact of off - grid renewables.
The Court, in order
to be in line both with the intention of the Transparency
Regulation to ensure the «widest possible
access to documents» and with the requirement
to protect privacy and integrity, redefined the request for
access in accordance
to the complainant's aim.
129 In the third place, as regards the argument that the disclosure of
documents relating
to the ACTA could only have reinforced the public interest with regard
to international relations and avoid controversy arising from the leaked publication of certain proposals, it should be noted that, while it is true that the purpose of
Regulation No 1049/2001 is to ensure maximum transparency by giving the fullest possible effect to the right of public access to documents of the European Union (recital 4 of the regulation), it nevertheless provides exceptions to the right of access to protect certain public or private interests, and in the present case, the public interest as regards international
Regulation No 1049/2001 is
to ensure maximum transparency by giving the fullest possible effect
to the right of public
access to documents of the European Union (recital 4 of the
regulation), it nevertheless provides exceptions to the right of access to protect certain public or private interests, and in the present case, the public interest as regards international
regulation), it nevertheless provides exceptions
to the right of
access to protect certain public or private interests, and in the present case, the public interest as regards international relations.
Lastly, the EU has adopted a transparency
regulation (Regulation 1049/2001 on public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents) which enables citizens to request access to documents of these ins
regulation (
Regulation 1049/2001 on public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents) which enables citizens to request access to documents of these ins
Regulation 1049/2001 on public
access to European Parliament, Council and Commission
documents) which enables citizens
to request
access to documents of these institutions.
On 17 March 2016,
Access Info Europe («the applicant») made a request
to the Commission pursuant
to the Transparency
Regulation for
documents relating
to the meeting of 7 March 2016.
As a consequence, the Member States were now ready
to acknowledge openness as a legal principle in the Amsterdam Treaty, and
to give
access to documents a separate treaty base that paved the way for the replacement of the institutions» three internal decisions by a legislative act,
Regulation 1049, which was adopted on 30 May 2001.
Trivial observations (e.g., long lists of Member States that have at any one time been involved in
access to documents litigation without any convincing conclusion following from such an enumeration) are succeeded by confused conceptualisations (e.g., the EU institutions are introduced twice as a distinct category of actor), or even outright overdramatization, such as when the authors argue that «[a] t one stroke, any authority of the Member States -LSB-...] over the release of
documents transmitted
to the EU was set aside [by
Regulation 1049/01]» (p. 216), but neglect
to mention that the Member States as legislators in the Council agreed
to this revision themselves, or that the Council engaged in successive internal negotiations
to settle the question of what was
to be considered a «Member State
document».
As exemplified by the merger of Kroll Ontrack with LDiscovery in late 2016, ediscovery suppliers recognise the need for organisations
to access local data processing centres and
document review services in order
to comply with data privacy
regulations, and
to partner with global firms that can provide these facilities anywhere in the world.
Our conversation with LegalZoom CEO John CEO ranged from the nuts and bolts of how LegalZoom builds
documents to the role it plays in
access to justice, its emphasis on Net Promoter Score, 10,000 hours of law practice, and
regulation, including LegalZoom's brushes with various states» ethics boards.
Passports and Consular Officer — Customer Service Duties & Responsibilities Deliver on - site support
to all departments and coordinate all daily business efforts through effective collaboration and communication with team members while providing and ensuring a high - quality customer service experience Track, file, and view important
documents, applications, information and records on a daily basis, organizing and maintaining sensitive files in an efficient and organized manner Develop and employ a working knowledge of related procedures,
regulations and legal applications with respect
to the administration of organizational services Act as a liaison between all interested parties
to ensure effective information flow, exceptional customer service, efficient operations administration and timely issue resolution Prepare various materials as well as manage all data and information with the utilization of various software applications, including word processing, database and spreadsheet programs Collaborate in the execution of various operational aspects, including statistics management, information exports and backups, and regular records updates Support various reception functions, including acting as first point of contact
to guests as well as ensuring the placement of accurate and up -
to - date information related
to services and fees throughout reception area Address and resolve client queries and issues in a timely manner, researching all topics thoroughly for complete solutions Provide translation and interpretation services as needed
to on - site and Australia - based staff in relation
to complex consular matters, including official meetings and functions Maintain security of and
access to sensitive information, systems and other data Provide phone coverage as needed as well as manage various forms of critical correspondence Assist mid - and senior - level management with various other duties as assigned
to facilitate efficient administrative and business operations