(6) «Access to Justice: A Critique of the Federation of Law Societies of Canada's Inventory of
Access to Legal Services Initiatives of the Law Societies of Canada» (SSRN, May 20, 2014); and,
See: «Access to Justice: A Critique of the Federation of Law Societies of Canada's Inventory of
Access to Legal Services Initiatives of the Law Societies of Canada» (SSRN, pdf.).
However, the Federation of Law Societies of Canada's report, Inventory of
Access to Legal Services Initiatives of the Law Societies of Canada (Sept. 2012) defines the problem (paragraph 1) as being merely, «gaps in access to legal services.»
wouldn't tell the public that the problem is not the Law Society's problem, as in effect it does; (15) LSUC's website wouldn't state that lay benchers «represent the public interest,» which is impossible now that we are well beyond the 19th century; (16) CanLII's services would be upgraded in kind and volume to be a true support service, able to have a substantial impact upon the problem, and several other developed support services, all provided at cost, would together, provide a complete solution; (17) LSUC's management would not be part - time management by amateurs - amateurs because benchers don't have the expertise to solve the problem, nor are they trying to get it, nor are they joining with Canada's other law societies to solve this national problem; (18) the Federation of Law Societies of Canada would not describe the problem as being one of mere «gaps in access to legal services» (see its Sept. 2012 text, «Inventory of
Access to Legal Services Initiatives of the Law Societies of Canada» (1st paragraph), (19) LSUC would not be encouraging the use alternatives to lawyers, such as law students, self - help, and «unbundled, targeted» legal services, as a «cutting costs by cutting competence» strategy; and, (20) it would not be necessary to impose an Ontario version of the Clementi Report (UK, 2004) that would separate LSUC's regulatory functions from its representative functions, to be exercised by separate authorities.
[vi] See: Ken Chasse, «Access to Justice: A Critique of the Federation of Law Societies of Canada's «Inventory of
Access to Legal Services Initiatives of the Law Societies of Canada».»
For example the Federation of Law Societies» (FLSC's) text, Inventory of
Access to Legal Services Initiatives of the Law Societies of Canada of 2012, [v] defines the problem in its opening paragraph as being merely, «gaps in access to legal services.»
The confession that the legal profession is unable to cope is well documented and made patent in the Federation of Law Societies of Canada's (the FLSC's) published text, «Inventory of
Access to Legal Services Initiatives of the Law Societies of Canada» (Sept. 2012).
In fact, the Federation of Law Societies of Canada's text, «Inventory of
Access to Legal Services Initiatives of the Law Societies of Canada» (Sept. 2012; FLSC website), refers to the problem as being merely, «gaps in access to legal services....»
[5] Click on the highlighted word «inventory,» in the last line at this site, which states: «The Federation's Standing Committee on Access to Legal Services has produced an inventory of
access to legal services initiatives of Canada» law societies.»
See also: (1) «Access to Justice: A Critique of the Federation of Law Societies of Canada's Inventory of
Access to Legal Services Initiatives of the Law Societies of Canada» (pdf; posted on the SSRN on, May 21, 2014); and, (2) «Self - Represented Litigants» Tax Money Provides More Funding for Legal Aid Ontario,» (posted on Slaw, on July 31, 2015).
See: «Access to Justice: A Critique of the Federation of Law Societies of Canada's Inventory of
Access to Legal Services Initiatives of the Law Societies of Canada» (pdf.).
For example, the Federation of Law Societies of Canada's publication, «Inventory of
Access to Legal Services Initiatives of the Law Societies of Canada,» (Sept. 2012) recommends lowering legal costs so as to preserve the existing system by means of using much less competent alternatives to using experienced lawyers — students, paralegals, unbundling of legal services, and the unpredictable capacity, availability, and timing of services provided pro bono.
Not exact matches
NEW YORK CITY — Tenants facing eviction will receive free
access to legal services as part of a $ 93 million
initiative, city officials announced this week.
Finally, a global
initiative hosted by the United Nations and led by high profile policymakers, including US Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy, has recommended the liberalization of the regulation of
legal services in order
to allow nonlawyers and community - based organizations and advocacy groups
to provide
legal services to the poor, stating that «it is likely
to improve
access to justice for the poor substantially while imposing relatively few costs on society,» and that a «major attraction» of such liberalization is that it may require «fewer government or donor expenditures.»
Delivering
access to justice demands change and action on a very broad range of
initiatives — pro bono work by the private bar, fair and adequate funding of
legal aid, collaboration among all system participants (clients, lawyers, courts, agencies, NGO's),
legal education (and its financing), e-filing and case data standards, court forms, court interfaces
to self - represented litigants, unbundled
legal services, virtual law practice, multistate practice, law practice ownership and investment, limited practice licenses, unauthorized practice of law rules, lawyer advertising rules, and lawyer discipline.
CFCJ has just completed what it calls The Alberta
Legal Services Mapping Project (ALSMP), which was a large - scale, collaborative research initiative designed to gain a better understanding of what legal needs Albertans have, the extent to which these needs are currently being met, and how access to legal services can be impr
Legal Services Mapping Project (ALSMP), which was a large - scale, collaborative research initiative designed to gain a better understanding of what legal needs Albertans have, the extent to which these needs are currently being met, and how access to legal services can be i
Services Mapping Project (ALSMP), which was a large - scale, collaborative research
initiative designed
to gain a better understanding of what
legal needs Albertans have, the extent to which these needs are currently being met, and how access to legal services can be impr
legal needs Albertans have, the extent
to which these needs are currently being met, and how
access to legal services can be impr
legal services can be i
services can be improved.
This
initiative was the first of its kind in Canada
to recognize the importance of ensuring continued
access to legal services in small communities and rural areas and
to highlight the challenges that these communities were and continue
to face.
Allocations include: nearly $ 4.8 million in additional annual funding for
legal aid, with a focus on indigenous and family law services; $ 3.8 million per year to fund expansion of Parents Legal Centres; $ 5 million more per year for sheriff services and court staff to help reduce delays in the court system; and an additional $ 3.3 million annually for government initiatives related to family dispute resolution services and increasing digital access to justice serv
legal aid, with a focus on indigenous and family law
services; $ 3.8 million per year
to fund expansion of Parents
Legal Centres; $ 5 million more per year for sheriff services and court staff to help reduce delays in the court system; and an additional $ 3.3 million annually for government initiatives related to family dispute resolution services and increasing digital access to justice serv
Legal Centres; $ 5 million more per year for sheriff
services and court staff
to help reduce delays in the court system; and an additional $ 3.3 million annually for government
initiatives related
to family dispute resolution
services and increasing digital
access to justice
services.
The purpose of the Center «is
to position the ABA as a leader and architect of the profession's efforts
to increase
access to legal services and improve the delivery of, and
access to, those
services to the public through innovative programs and
initiatives.»
Accordingly, the first paragraph of this «Inventory of
Initiatives» text defines the problem as being merely, «gaps in
access to legal services.»
As these
Initiatives unfold, we are increasingly convinced of the interplay between the two: that opportunities, transformations, and cultural shifts engendered by innovation can be leveraged towards positive changes in
access to justice, and conversely, that
access to justice can grow through, amongst other things, a reinvention of the delivery of
legal services.
He's also involved with an
initiative called Houston.AI which began with the realization that emerging technologies, based on artificial intelligence and machine learning, had tremendous potential
to improve
access to legal services.
I really think by the end of this year you are going
to see 30, 40 active ODR
initiatives in the US, working with
legal service bureaus, working with courts, expanding
access and I think it's just going
to grow from there.
The Center for Innovation was designed
to position the ABA as a leader of the
legal profession's efforts
to increase
access to justice and improve the delivery of
services to the public through innovative programs and
initiatives.
A third category of
access to justice
initiatives seeks
to provide
legal support
services by delivering
legal information
to the public through websites or through front line workers who are often not legally trained.
June 10, 2016 — «As part of an
initiative designed
to improve
access to legal services, the Tennessee Supreme Court has created a new way for attorneys
to earn required CLE credit for doing pro bono work and the court has designated Nashville's Bass Berry & Sims as the first firm in the state
to offer the program.
Participating in the working group on Non-Lawyers Working
to Help Narrow the Justice Gap, Niki De Mel, Pro Bono and Special
Initiatives Coordinator for Pro Bono Net, and Michelle had occasion to discuss LiveHelp, DEN and other PBN initiatives while emphasizing the appropriate use of technology and non-lawyers in increasing access to justice, not replacing traditional lega
Initiatives Coordinator for Pro Bono Net, and Michelle had occasion
to discuss LiveHelp, DEN and other PBN
initiatives while emphasizing the appropriate use of technology and non-lawyers in increasing access to justice, not replacing traditional lega
initiatives while emphasizing the appropriate use of technology and non-lawyers in increasing
access to justice, not replacing traditional
legal services.
As I sat in the auditorium full of law school administrators and
legal service providers at my first Annual Law School
Access to Justice Conference, I anticipated a long day of theoretical discussions about diversifying the profession and getting law schools more involved in access to justice initiatives in New York
Access to Justice Conference, I anticipated a long day of theoretical discussions about diversifying the profession and getting law schools more involved in
access to justice initiatives in New York
access to justice
initiatives in New York State.
Better resources are becoming available online, including the Family Law Nova Scotia website at nsfamilylaw.ca, and several new pro bono
initiatives aim
to fill gaps in
legal services, such as Access Legal Help NS at www.legalinfo
legal services, such as
Access Legal Help NS at www.legalinfo
Legal Help NS at www.legalinfo.org.
Recent
initiatives of the judiciary,
legal service organizations, and the bar
to improve
access to justice all depend ultimately on timely, accurate, and economic distribution of the state's judicial precedent.
The project leverages LawHelp Interactive (LHI), a national online document assembly
service that provides support
to access to justice
initiatives by
legal services, court, pro bono, and law school programs in more than 40 states.
Access to Justice BC's family unbundling
initiative is proceeding in tandem with Mediate BC's Family Unbundled
Legal Services Project.
Every regulatory activity and
initiative must clearly enhance either
access to legal services or lawyers» professional standards.
The
initiative, which Addario spearheaded as president of the Criminal Lawyers» Association, resulted in the government of Ontario increasing
legal aid fees, which greatly improves
access to justice and delivery of
legal services in the province.
The Committee welcomes the
initiatives to make available
to women facilities
to ensure their equal
access to legal services, including in rural areas, and the strengthening of the Sex Discrimination Act, 1984.