She also leads the firm's Criminal Justice
Act federal trial team for the Southern District of Florida.
Not exact matches
These risks and uncertainties include: Gilead's ability to achieve its anticipated full year 2018 financial results; Gilead's ability to sustain growth in revenues for its antiviral and other programs; the risk that private and public payers may be reluctant to provide, or continue to provide, coverage or reimbursement for new products, including Vosevi, Yescarta, Epclusa, Harvoni, Genvoya, Odefsey, Descovy, Biktarvy and Vemlidy ®; austerity measures in European countries that may increase the amount of discount required on Gilead's products; an increase in discounts, chargebacks and rebates due to ongoing contracts and future negotiations with commercial and government payers; a larger than anticipated shift in payer mix to more highly discounted payer segments and geographic regions and decreases in treatment duration; availability of funding for state AIDS Drug Assistance Programs (ADAPs); continued fluctuations in ADAP purchases driven by
federal and state grant cycles which may not mirror patient demand and may cause fluctuations in Gilead's earnings; market share and price erosion caused by the introduction of generic versions of Viread and Truvada, an uncertain global macroeconomic environment; and potential amendments to the Affordable Care
Act or other government action that could have the effect of lowering prices or reducing the number of insured patients; the possibility of unfavorable results from clinical
trials involving investigational compounds; Gilead's ability to initiate clinical
trials in its currently anticipated timeframes; the levels of inventory held by wholesalers and retailers which may cause fluctuations in Gilead's earnings; Kite's ability to develop and commercialize cell therapies utilizing the zinc finger nuclease technology platform and realize the benefits of the Sangamo partnership; Gilead's ability to submit new drug applications for new product candidates in the timelines currently anticipated; Gilead's ability to receive regulatory approvals in a timely manner or at all, for new and current products, including Biktarvy; Gilead's ability to successfully commercialize its products, including Biktarvy; the risk that physicians and patients may not see advantages of these products over other therapies and may therefore be reluctant to prescribe the products; Gilead's ability to successfully develop its hematology / oncology and inflammation / respiratory programs; safety and efficacy data from clinical studies may not warrant further development of Gilead's product candidates, including GS - 9620 and Yescarta in combination with Pfizer's utomilumab; Gilead's ability to pay dividends or complete its share repurchase program due to changes in its stock price, corporate or other market conditions; fluctuations in the foreign exchange rate of the U.S. dollar that may cause an unfavorable foreign currency exchange impact on Gilead's future revenues and pre-tax earnings; and other risks identified from time to time in Gilead's reports filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC).
When the
trial court ruled against the AG's office, we encouraged them to appeal, but unfortunately the chances of a successful appeal under the
federal Natural Gas
Act were low.
SB 219 would serve to clarify employer requirements and keep New Hampshire in compliance with current
Federal laws and court decisions, including the March 25 Supreme Court ruling on Young vs United Parcel Service (UPS), which ruled in favor of Peggy Young to reverse the lower court's decision and to have a trial, after she sued UPS under the federal Pregnancy Discrimination Act, for failure to provide pregnancy accommod
Federal laws and court decisions, including the March 25 Supreme Court ruling on Young vs United Parcel Service (UPS), which ruled in favor of Peggy Young to reverse the lower court's decision and to have a
trial, after she sued UPS under the
federal Pregnancy Discrimination Act, for failure to provide pregnancy accommod
federal Pregnancy Discrimination
Act, for failure to provide pregnancy accommodations.
He told them he's disappointed that they failed to
act on measures to change the way billions of dollars in state contracts are solicited and awarded, even though several of Cuomo's former associates are facing
federal trials on corruption charges next year.
He told them he's disappointed that they failed to
act on measures to change the way billions of dollars in state contracts are solicited and awarded, even though several of Governor Cuomo's former associates are facing
federal trials on corruption charges next year.
In separate
federal court
trials in Manhattan last year, each man's alleged «official
acts» included a mixture of actual exercises of governmental power — like casting votes and providing funding — and more subtle behavior, like arranging meetings, providing job references and making phone calls.
Acting U.S. Attorney Joon Kim, the head of the
federal prosecutor's office in Manhattan, recently told the judge that breaking the case into two
trials is fair in order to accommodate scheduling conflicts for defense lawyers as well as Ciminelli's health issues.
Halloran is on
trial in White Plains
federal court for allegedly
acting as a power broker in state Sen. Malcolm Smith's (D - Hollis) ploy to allegedly bribe New York City county Republican parties into authorizing him to run for mayor on the GOP line.
In what has turned out to be a landmark decision, the Court ruled in Daubert that
federal trial judges must
act as gatekeepers in order to exclude unreliable evidence from the courtroom.
You agree that, by agreeing to these Terms of Use, the U.S.
Federal Arbitration
Act governs the interpretation and enforcement of this provision, and that you and Company are each waiving the right to a
trial by jury or to participate in a class action.
The 7th Circuit upheld a
trial judge's ruling dismissing the case, holding that the
federal Communications Decency
Act doesn't permit people to «sue the messenger just because the message reveals a third party's plan to engage in unlawful discrimination».
The suit would be tried in state court — unless I brought a counter-suit against card issuer for some violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices
Act, in which case the
trial would probably go to
federal court.
In that
trial, Silverman blamed the
federal government's refusal to
act on an erroneous interpretation of eligibility to transfer to the Canadian correction system from another country.
A Pennsylvania Superior court held that a
trial judge did not violate the
Federal Arbitration
Act (FAA) by refusing to split up a plaintiff's wrongful death and survival claims arising out of the death of a nursing home resident.
Long worked with nationally renowned
trial attorney Herbert Hafif under whom he handled all phases of litigation and
trial preparation work in cases involving catastrophic personal injury, complex business litigation,
federal False Claim
Act cases and insurance bad faith.
In this groundbreaking case, the Michigan Court of Appeals ruled that the
trial court correctly dismissed a legal malpractice suit against the attorney and his law firm because the underlying product liability claim plaintiffs» asserted should have been pursued was statutorily preempted under the
federal Medical Device
Act («MDA»).
The Court affirmed the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
Federal Circuit, holding that the USPTO
acted within its authority in promulgating rules requiring the Patent
Trial and Appeal Board to...
In a recent decision, a three - judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
Federal Circuit ruled that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Patent
Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)
acted properly in issuing a final decision as to some — but not all — claims challenged in...
Antigone has
acted as lead
trial counsel and appellate counsel in
federal civil lawsuits across the United States and she has represented numerous Fortune 500 companies involved in high stakes intellectual property disputes and a variety of other business and legal issues.
The State convinced the
trial court to charge the jury using the broader definitions of the «storage» and «disposal» in the
federal Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act instead of the definitions of those terms in the Connecticut General Statutes.
Being certified by the Supreme Court of New Jersey as a Civil
Trial Attorney, Francisco J. Rodriguez has represented clients in a broad spectrum of personal injury matters including medical malpractice, nursing home malpractice, mass torts,
Federal Tort Claims
Act cases, and automobile accidents.
On October 4, 2017, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
Federal Circuit issued an en banc decision rejecting certain procedures adopted by the Patent
Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) limiting a patent owner's ability to amend claims during Inter Partes Review (IPR) proceedings under the America Invents
Act.
The Court of Appeals for the
Federal Circuit, the reviewing court for the decisions issued by the Patent
Trial and Appeal Board, has handled over 1,000 appeals from the Board on patent
trials authorized by the America Invents
Act.
Stephen E. Goldman, the firm's managing partner, has served as counsel for insurers in many significant property insurance and class action cases, including Standard Fire v. Knowles, 133 S. Ct. 1345 (2013)(holding that the plaintiff's stipulation can not defeat
federal jurisdiction under the Class Action Fairness
Act) and Travco v. Ward, 736 S.E. 2d 321 (Va. 2012)(affirming the
trial court's judgment that property insurance policies do not cover losses caused by the presence of Chinese drywall).
On June 8, 2015, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
Federal Circuit again considered one of the earliest final decisions from the USPTO's Patent
Trial and Appeal Board («PTAB» or «Board») in an inter partes review proceeding under the Leahy - Smith America Invents
Act of 2011 («AIA»).
Defended gasoline refiner in
trial in
federal court brought by a terminated wholesale gasoline distributor under Petroleum Marketing Practices
Act
This includes
acting as the President of the American Association for Justice, the President of the International Academy of
Trial Lawyers as well as serving as Chairman of the Florida
Federal Judicial Nominating Commission.
The Court affirmed the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
Federal Circuit, holding that the USPTO
acted within its authority in promulgating rules requiring the Patent
Trial and Appeal Board to construe patent claims in inter partes review proceedings under the «broadest reasonable interpretation» (or «BRI») standard.
After a nine - day
trial in
federal court, won acquittal of a general manager of an international construction company charged with conspiracy, Hobbs
Act violations and bribery - related violations of 18 U.S.C. § 666 arising from efforts to obtain a $ 26 million energy performance contract from a local housing authority.
In a recent panel decision that deviates from the
Federal Circuit's current tendency to defer to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's interpretation of the Leahy - Smith America Invents
Act, the court vacated a final written decision of the USPTO Patent
Trial and Appeal Board.
He concentrates his practice in commercial
trial practice in
federal and state courts, USA PATRIOT
Act and Bank Secrecy
Act litigation and compliance matters, internal corporate investigations, and grand jury and administrative investigations.
Michael is a former
federal prosecutor and experienced
trial and appellate lawyer who focuses his practice on white collar criminal defense, internal investigations and False Claims
Act...
A
federal magistrate judge today ordered a woman who claimed to be a naturopathic doctor to be held pending
trial on charges she defrauded patients of the Euro Med Klinic in Hoover in 2015 by lying about her name, her credentials, her experience and her license to practice medicine, announced
Acting U.S. Attorney Robert Posey and U.S. Postal Inspector Frank Dyer.
This story notes a
federal judge's order in the Freedom of Information
Act case requiring the government to release redacted medical records entered as evidence at a doctor's
trial — a win for Rhode Island journalist Philip Eil.
Our
trial attorneys have obtained numerous judgments for clients in both
federal and state
trial courts, including claims where provisions of the Tort Immunity
Act were successfully argued to limit and / or completely bar claims.
In a suit by Canada Post, the
trial court decided that the USPS was not a «public authority» for the purposes of this
act, and the
Federal Court of Appeal confirmed that decision earlier this year.
Here are some highlights on the predictions offered by the panelists: 1) class actions are not going away; 2) the continued growth of mass commerce will continue to spawn class action litigation; 3) Justice Scalia's death will have a significant impact on class action jurisprudence going forward and the judiciary is likely to get less friendly to defendants in the short - term; 4) technology will make a big difference for the better in managing class action litigation; 5) defendants will continue to come up with creative, far - reaching ways of limiting class actions; 6) plaintiffs» attorneys will continue to bring class actions when a) they think they can make money and / or b) they think they will advance the public good; 7) there will be some good class actions and some horrible ones; 8) look out for states to pass new consumer protection laws similar to the New Jersey New Jersey Truth - in - Consumer Contract, Warranty and Notice
Act (TCCWNA); 9) the TCPA and all - natural litigation booms will continue in the near future; 10) The CFPB will broadly define consumer finance services; 11) more class actions will go to
trial; 12) what happens with the enforceability of arbitration clauses will have a big impact on the viability of many categories of class actions in the future; 13) look for more class actions in the
federal courts in New York state.
The Jango case was the first
Federal Court
trial for compensation under the Native Title
Act.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit affirmed the ruling of the
trial court, finding that the mortgage broker did not meet the definitions of a creditor as set by the
Act or by Regulation Z, the implementation regulation issued by the
Federal Reserve for the
Act.
A
federal trial court has ruled that the
federal Telephone Consumer Protection
Act («
Act») is unconstitutional.
Employees hired through an agency sponsored by the
federal Job Training Partnership
Act (in Bowen's area, the Private Industry Council) work a three - month
trial period in exchange for their welfare check; in other words, Bowen didn't pay a penny for 90 days of help.