(ii) the certificate may be taken into account by a court when determining whether to make an order under section 13C of
the Act referring the parties to family dispute resolution or to award costs against a party under section 117 of the Act.
Not exact matches
Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include, without limitation: (1) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including financial market conditions, fluctuations in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, levels of end market demand in construction and in both the commercial and defense segments of the aerospace industry, levels of air travel, financial condition of commercial airlines, the impact of weather conditions and natural disasters and the financial condition of our customers and suppliers; (2) challenges in the development, production, delivery, support, performance and realization of the anticipated benefits of advanced technologies and new products and services; (3) the scope, nature, impact or timing of acquisition and divestiture or restructuring activity, including the pending acquisition of Rockwell Collins, including among other things integration of acquired businesses into United Technologies» existing businesses and realization of synergies and opportunities for growth and innovation; (4) future timing and levels of indebtedness, including indebtedness expected to be incurred by United Technologies in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition, and capital spending and research and development spending, including in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition; (5) future availability of credit and factors that may affect such availability, including credit market conditions and our capital structure; (6) the timing and scope of future repurchases of United Technologies» common stock, which may be suspended at any time due to various factors, including market conditions and the level of other investing activities and uses of cash, including in connection with the proposed acquisition of Rockwell; (7) delays and disruption in delivery of materials and services from suppliers; (8) company and customer - directed cost reduction efforts and restructuring costs and savings and other consequences thereof; (9) new business and investment opportunities; (10) our ability to realize the intended benefits of organizational changes; (11) the anticipated benefits of diversification and balance of operations across product lines, regions and industries; (12) the outcome of legal proceedings, investigations and other contingencies; (13) pension plan assumptions and future contributions; (14) the impact of the negotiation of collective bargaining agreements and labor disputes; (15) the effect of changes in political conditions in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate, including the effect of changes in U.S. trade policies or the U.K.'s pending withdrawal from the EU, on general market conditions, global trade policies and currency exchange rates in the near term and beyond; (16) the effect of changes in tax (including U.S. tax reform enacted on December 22, 2017, which is commonly
referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs
Act of 2017), environmental, regulatory (including among other things import / export) and other laws and regulations in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate; (17) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins to receive the required regulatory approvals (and the risk that such approvals may result in the imposition of conditions that could adversely affect the combined company or the expected benefits of the merger) and to satisfy the other conditions to the closing of the pending acquisition on a timely basis or at all; (18) the occurrence of events that may give rise to a right of one or both of United Technologies or Rockwell Collins to terminate the merger agreement, including in circumstances that might require Rockwell Collins to pay a termination fee of $ 695 million to United Technologies or $ 50 million of expense reimbursement; (19) negative effects of the announcement or the completion of the merger on the market price of United Technologies» and / or Rockwell Collins» common stock and / or on their respective financial performance; (20) risks related to Rockwell Collins and United Technologies being restricted in their operation of their businesses while the merger agreement is in effect; (21) risks relating to the value of the United Technologies» shares to be issued in connection with the pending Rockwell acquisition, significant merger costs and / or unknown liabilities; (22) risks associated with third
party contracts containing consent and / or other provisions that may be triggered by the Rockwell merger agreement; (23) risks associated with merger - related litigation or appraisal proceedings; and (24) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins, or the combined company, to retain and hire key personnel.
Mediation
refers to the process of resolving legal disputes with the help of a professional mediator who
acts as a neutral third
party and facilitates discussion.
Actually, under this new
act, which is being
referred to as FERA, the AG, a local government, or a whistleblower to bring a lawsuit against any
party who makes or uses a false or fraudulent claim, record or statement to obtain government funds.
However, under legislation passed by the Labour government the Electoral Commission can
refer the case to the police, who could launch an investigation under the Political
Parties, Elections and Referendums
Act 2000.
[225][221] The Commission also found that the
Party Treasurer, Simon Day, may not have fulfilled his obligations under the Political
Parties, Elections and Referendums
Act 2000 and
referred him for investigation to the Metropolitan Police Service.
It also
refers to the Chakrabarti inquiry and claims that the suspension could be a breach of the 1998 Human Rights
Act, including by stopping him attending
party meetings and expressing a political choice.
The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA), hereafter
referred to as the «Agencies,» are engaging interested
parties in a discussion on the use of programmatic approaches to conduct environmental reviews, as required by Section 1305 of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century
Act (MAP - 21; 23 U.S.C. 139 (b)(3)-RRB-.
Tags: bodily injury, e & o, general liability, home inspector insurance, home inspector liability, Home Inspectors, incidental coverage, independent contractor, limit levels, policy, prior
acts, property damage,
referring party, tail coverage, volume 19
I must preemptively
refer you to John Gregory's post from last year when it comes to canvassing the laws, and lack thereof, around how third
party services (like Google, Facebook, PayPal, etc.) are obliged to
act upon the death of an account holder.
(1) Regarding the formation and effect of a contract (excluding labor contracts; hereinafter
referred to in this Article as «consumer contract») between a consumer (i.e., an individual, excluding those cases where the
party acts as a business or for a business) and a business operator (i.e., a juridical person or other corporate association, or an individual in those cases where the
party is
acting as a business or for a business), even where by choice under Article 7 or variation under Article 9, the applicable law would be a law other than that of the consumer's habitual residence, when the consumer indicates to the business operator his or her intention that a particular mandatory rule from within the law of the consumer's habitual residence should apply, this mandatory rule shall also apply to the matters covered by the rule concerning the consumer contract's formation and effect.
The Court of Appeal has found this section of the
Act presumes a successful
party is entitled to costs (even if the Court does not
refer to costs in its reasons).
(2) No person may bring a proceeding in any court,
refer the issues in dispute to an arbitrator under section 282 or agree to submit an issue for arbitration in accordance with the Arbitration
Act, 1991 unless mediation was sought, mediation failed and, if the issues in dispute were
referred for an evaluation under section 280.1, the report of the person who performed the evaluation has been given to the
parties.
In Faithorn Farrell Timms LLP v Bailey [2016] the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) considered the scope of section 111A of the Employment Rights
Act 1996 where an employee brought claims for both unfair dismissal and discrimination and the pre-termination negotiations were
referred to by both
parties during the Tribunal proceedings.
The SCC does not
act as repository under the Rules on Transparency, but
refers parties and Tribunals to the UNCITRAL Transparency Registry, which is the central repository as foreseen under Article 8 of the Rules on Transparency.
Negligence
refers to a
party's failure to
act in a way that an ordinarily prudent person would
act under the circumstances to prevent an unreasonable risk of harm.
Under section 72 of the 1996
Act, a
party who takes no part in the arbitral proceedings can apply to the court for a declaration or injunction restraining arbitration proceedings by challenging: (i) the validity of an arbitration agreement; (ii) whether the arbitral tribunal has been properly constituted; or (iii) the matters that have been
referred to arbitration.
(i) Whether the applicant has provided evidence sufficient to raise a valid, bona fide or reasonable claim; (ii) Whether the applicant has established a relationship with the third
party from whom the information is sought such that it establishes that the third
party is somehow involved in the
acts complained of; (iii) Whether the third
party is the only practicable source of the information available; (iv) Whether the third
party can be indemnified for costs to which the third
party may be exposed because of the disclosure, some [authorities]
refer to the associated expenses of complying with the orders, while others speak of damages; and (v) Whether the interests of justice favour the obtaining of disclosure.
If so requested by a country that is a
party to the North American Free Trade Agreement, the Minister may, by a statement published in the Canada Gazette, grant the benefits conferred by this section, subject to any terms and conditions specified in the statement, to performers who are nationals of that country or another country that is a
party to the Agreement or are Canadian citizens or permanent residents within the meaning of subsection 2 (1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection
Act and whose performer's performances are embodied in works other than the prescribed cinematographic works
referred to in subsection (3).
The construction contract contained a three stage dispute resolution process, being: 1) disputes were to be determined by the respondent's supervising engineer; 2) if the dispute was not resolved, it would be
referred to adjudication by a sole adjudicator; and 3) if a
party did not accept the adjudication, it could
refer the dispute to arbitration pursuant to the International Commercial Arbitration
Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. I. 9, which incorporates the Model Law.
Lord Hoffmann
referred to the US case of Kremen v Online Classifieds Inc (2003) 337 F 3rd 1024 in which «it was held that a publicly funded company which provided gratuitous registration of internet domain names could be liable in conversion, on a footing of strict liability, for transferring a registered name to a third
party, having
acted in good faith on the authority of a forged letter».
For any dispute or difference shall arise as to the quantum to be paid under Policy (liability being otherwise admitted) such difference shall independently of all other questions be
referred to the decision of a sole arbitrator to be appointed in writing by the
parties to or if they can not agree upon a single arbitrator within 30 days of any part invoking arbitration, the same shall be
referred to a panel of three arbitrator, comprising of two arbitrator, one to be appointed by each of the
parties to the dispute / difference and the third arbitrator to be appointed by such two arbitrators and arbitration shall be conducted under and in accordance with the provision of the Arbitration and Conciliation
Act, 1996.
Under the process, if the policyholder gets admitted in a network hospital
referred technically as the Preferred Provider Network (PPN), all expenses are directly settled by the insurance company through Third -
Party Administrators (TPAs) who
act as an intermediary between the hospital and the insurance company.
Consequently, the NNTT considered each factor, and
referred to the preamble of the Native Title
Act and the principle that a beneficial construction should be given to the provisions of the
Act which are designed to protect native title rights and interests or which otherwise reflect other interests and concerns of native title
parties and Aboriginal people so as to give the fullest relief which the fair meaning of the language will allow.
Mediation
refers to the process of resolving legal disputes with the help of a professional mediator who
acts as a neutral third
party and facilitates discussion.
In response to these outstanding legal issues the CR Review recommended that the tribunal and
parties be encouraged to make greater use of the provisions of the Native Title
Act and of the Federal Court Rules such as Order 29 rule 2 to
refer particular issues of fact and law to the court for determination.
(2) Where the
parties have lived separately and apart for a continuous period of not less than 12 months immediately preceding the date of commencement of this
Act, pending proceedings for a decree of dissolution of marriage shall, if either
party so requests, be dealt with as if they were proceedings instituted under this
Act on the ground
referred to in section 48, and, in relation to proceedings in which such a request is made, subsection 48 (2) has effect as if the proceedings for dissolution of marriage had been instituted by an application filed on the date of commencement of this
Act.
(2A) Where subsection (2) does not apply but the
parties have lived separately and apart for a continuous period of not less than 12 months immediately preceding the date of making of the request under this subsection, pending proceedings for a decree of dissolution of marriage shall, if either
party so requests, be dealt with as if they were proceedings instituted under this
Act on the ground
referred to in section 48, and, in relation to proceedings in which such a request is made, subsection 48 (2) has effect as if the proceedings for dissolution of marriage had been instituted by an application filed on the date of making of the request.
(5) If the power
referred to in paragraph (1)(f) is delegated under subsection (1), a Registrar shall not exercise the power on application by a
party to proceedings under this
Act unless:
On July 1, 1999 the Homeowner Protection
Act Regulations came into force requiring registered builders to provide third -
party warranty insurance on new homes, commonly
referred to as 2-5-10 year home warranty because it provides coverage for two years of labour, five years on the building envelope, and 10 years on the structure.
Law dictionaries usually
refer to agents as being authorized to
act for or in place of a
party.
2.11 A person who is providing trading services only by
referring a
party to a trade in real estate to a licensee, or by
referring a licensee to a
party, for the purpose of the licensee providing trading services, is exempt from the requirement to be licensed under Part 2 of the
Act in relation to the person's provision of those referral services if
79 DOS 99 Matter of DOS v. Pagano - disclosure of agency relationships; failure to appear at hearing; proper business practices; unauthorized practice of law; unearned commissions; vicarious liability; fraudulent practice; jurisdiction; ex parte hearing may proceed upon proof of proper service; DOS has jurisdiction after expiration of respondents» licenses as
acts of misconduct occurred and the proceedings were commenced while the respondents were licensed; licensee fails to timely provide seller client with agency disclosure form prior to entering into listing agreement and fails to timely provide agency disclosure form to buyer upon first substantive contact; broker fails to make it clear for which
party he is
acting; broker violates 19 NYCRR 175.24 by using exclusive right to sell listing agreement without mandatory definitions of «exclusive right to sell» and «exclusive agency»; broker breaches fiduciary duties to seller clients by misleading them as to buyer's ability to financially consummate the transaction; broker breaches his fiduciary duty to seller by
referring seller to the attorney who represented the buyers when he knew or should have known such attorney could not properly protect seller's interests; improper for broker to use listing agreements providing for broker to retain one half of any deposit if forfeited by buyer as such forfeiture clause could, by its terms, allow broker to retain part of the deposit when broker did not earn a commission; broker must conduct business under name as it appears on license; broker engaged in the unauthorized practice of law in preparing contracts for purchase and sale of real estate which did not contain a clause making it subject to the approval of the
parties» attorneys and were not a form recommended by a joint bar / real estate board committee; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness and incompetency in using sales contract which purported to change the terms of the listing agreement to include a higher commission; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness and incompetency in using contracts of sale which were unclear, ambiguous, vague and incomplete; broker failed to amend purchase agreement to reflect amendment to increase deposit amount; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness in back - dating purchase agreements; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness in participating in scheme to have seller hold undisclosed second mortgage and to mislead first mortgagee about the purchaser's financial ability to purchase; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness by claiming unearned commission and filing affidavit of entitlement for unearned commission; DOS fails to establish by substantial evidence that respondent
acted as undisclosed dual agent; corporate broker bound by the knowledge acquired by and is responsible for
acts committed by its licensees within the actual or apparent scope of their authority; corporate and individual brokers» licenses revoked, no action taken on application for renewal until proof of payment of sum of $ 2,000.00 plus interests for deposits unlawfully retained