Add calorie labels to the selection buttons on beverage vending machines to show calorie counts per beverage container.
And member companies voluntarily
added calorie labels to the front of all their packages with the Clear on Calories initiative so consumers know exactly how many calories are in the beverage before making a purchase.
New evidence published in the Cochrane Library today shows that
adding calorie labels to menus and next to food in restaurants, coffee shops and cafeterias, could reduce the calories that people consume, although the quality of evidence is low.
Not exact matches
So for a 2,000
calorie diet, the standard used on the nutrition
label, that can of Coke, containing 240
calories, would provide 120 % of your daily
added sugar intake.
Formulators from the top brands are exploring options to reduce
added sugar, lower
calories, create simple, clean ingredient
labels or increase protein levels.
America's beverage companies are
adding the new
calorie labels to the front of every can, bottle and pack they produce - and displaying the total
calories per container on all beverages 20 fluid ounces or smaller.
«GLG's high Reb M product line provides many different options for our customers who are seeking improved taste, greater
calorie and
added sugar reduction, and clean
label solutions for their latest food and beverage innovations,»
adds Rod Schanefelt, director, ADM, GLG's global sales and marketing partner.
On the subject of efforts made to optimise and adapt packaging to emphasise healthier products Andy
added, «yes we have looked at portion control,
labelling, highlighting
calories and it does make a difference to what people choose.»
Food
labels (
calories,
added sugars): As the Washington Post puts it, the food industry is counting on the current administration to back off on anything that might help us all make better food choices.
Labels such as «reduced
calorie» or «no
added sugar» are a turn - off to kids who might otherwise reach for flavored milk with non-nutritive (artificial) sweeteners at the school cafeteria or from the grocery store cooler.
The Review's lead author, Professor Theresa Marteau, Director of the Behaviour and Health Research Unit at the University of Cambridge, UK, says: «This evidence suggests that using nutritional
labelling could help reduce
calorie intake and make a useful impact as part of a wider set of measures aimed at tackling obesity,» She
added, «There is no «magic bullet» to solve the obesity problem, so while
calorie labelling may help, other measures to reduce
calorie intake are also needed.»
Combining results from eight studies carried out in artificial or laboratory settings could not show with certainty whether
adding labels would have an impact on
calories consumed.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration said it would update guidelines for nutritional
labels on packaged food and beverages to include information on
added sugar and to prominently display
calorie count and servings.
Results of the study
add to ongoing research from the team examining
calorie labeling's impact in different meal - ordering settings.
When researchers
added color - coded or numeric
calorie labels to online food ordering systems, the total
calories ordered was reduced by about 10 percent when compared to menus featuring no
calorie information at all.
«If someone is trying to adhere to a 1,400 -
calorie diet by reading
labels, yet packages can have up to a 20 % variation, the numbers just aren't going to
add up.
When the researchers compared
label users to nonusers they found — unsurprisingly — that the diets of
label readers were lower in total
calories, fat, saturated fat, sodium, and
added sugars.
Unfortunately, thereâ $ ™ s no way to look at a Nutrition Facts
label and tell how many
calories come from
added sugar.
Even if they're
labelled «100 % natural» and contain vitamins and minerals, the
calories still count and they
add up.
In fact, some processed foods that are
labeled fat free have even more
calories because of the refined sugars and carbs that have been
added to them.
Don't worry about being
labeled high maintenance, always order your dressings and sauces on the side — that way you control how many extra
calories to
add to your dish.
1.1 g fat, so we take 9
calories per gram x 1.1 = 9.9
calories from fat 19.1 g carbs, so we take 4
calories per gram x 19.1 = 76.4
calories from carbs 4.4 g protein, so we take 4
calories per gram x 4.4 = 17.6
calories from protein Now,
add these all up (9.9 +76.4 +17.6) = about 103
calories, which is basically the amount on the
calorie label.
I haven't done the
calorie counting to see how much they
add to my dish so definitely take a gander at the
labels before you make your selection if you're being strict on your caloric intake.
The proposed Nutrition Facts
label (right) has a few subtle differences from the current
label, including bolder
calorie counts and
added sugar information.
Calorie conscious pet owners will seek treats with nutritional details clearly
labeled on the bag, and more manufacturers like Stella & Chewy's and Primal Pet Foods, for example, are
adding these features to their packaging.