Not exact matches
The persistence of Rule 32 (h): The circuits are nearly evenly split on whether Rule 32 (h) requires a district court to
give advance notice before varying from the
advisory guidelines range.
In short, after Booker, it seems that federal sentencing does not require
giving «some significant weight» to the
advisory guidelines, and yet
giving them «some weight» is still required.
I have now re-read the Supreme Court's work in Gall, and I am intrigued by a weighty question left unaddressed by the majority opinion — namely, how much weight can and should the
guidelines be
given in a post-Booker
advisory sentencing system.