Sentences with phrase «after arguments in the case»

After arguments in the case, the Department of Homeland Security adopted a policy that treats forensic searches of digital devices as nonroutine border searches requiring reasonable suspicion of activity that violates the customs laws or in cases raising national security concerns, according to the opinion.

Not exact matches

When she exited the Supreme Court in March 2013 after the justices heard arguments in her case, hundreds of supporters chanted «Edie!

It is the problematic character of this step which makes the ontological argument unsatisfactory as a proof of God's existence although in the case of Hartshorne himself it was perhaps taken, implicitly if not explicitly, when, as he tells us, «about the age of seventeen, after reading Emerson's Essays, I made up my mind (doubtless with a somewhat hazy notion of what I was doing) to trust reason to the end» (LP viii).

Lord Herman Ouseley, the chairman of anti-racism organisation Kick It Out, drew a comparison with the case of former Aston Villa defender and Kick It Out trustee Paul Elliott, who resigned after using a racial slur in a private argument.

But another little - known option is available to the eight - member court: It could hear the cases in February or March, say, and the ninth justice, whenever he or she joins the court this term, could vote after reading the briefs and reviewing the argument on tape or by reading the transcript.

After the 2nd Circuit ruled last week, the three - judge panel hearing the appeal in the Skelos case asked lawyers to submit additional legal arguments in light of the Silver decision.

At 10 a.m., a Long Island man seeking exoneration after he pleaded guilty as an 18 - year - old in 1988 to sexually abusing boys and served 13 years in prison, Jesse Friedman, attends oral arguments in a state appeals court hearing seeking Nassau County DA and police files in the case; 45 Monroe Pl., Brooklyn.

With closing arguments complete, Judge Valerie E. Caproni is expected to instruct the jury in former Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver's corruption case today, after which it is to begin its deliberations.

«It's just surreal,» said Jaron Benjamin a week after the conviction of former Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver and on the day of closing arguments in the federal corruption case against former Senate Majority Leader Dean Skelos, knowing that those cases may have been bolstered by work he did years ago in the fight to strengthen the state's rent laws.

Jury deliberations could begin Thursday in the federal trial of State Senator John Sampson, after lawyers presented their closing arguments Wednesday in his obstruction of justice case.

Prosecutors said they will wrap up their case, which is in its fourth week, at around noon Tuesday and go right into closing arguments after lunch if there is no defense case.

The Supreme Court has a new opportunity to clarify matters in a case scheduled for oral argument on April 19, just days after Justice Neil Gorsuch's arrival on the bench.

After attending the oral argument on October 10th, I am more convinced that it is important these research findings inform the deliberations in the case.

Nearly two years after the trial in Vergara v. California first began, the case is set to move forward as judges from a state appeals court hear arguments Feb. 25.

Soon after the Court heard oral arguments, Justice Antonin Scalia died, and the case dead - locked in a 4 - to - 4 vote.

The very same issue was argued before the Supreme Court just two years ago in Friedrichs v. CTA, but when Justice Scalia died shortly after oral arguments, that case was left unresolved.

In case after case, we are able to make a logical argument that the customer was not completely upfront with the dealership during the transaction, and had the truth been known, the dealer likely would not have gone through with the transaction.

After being fired from her post as Chief of the Special Victims Unit for refusing to «go along to get along,» Alice Vachss published the incendiary Sex Crimes, described as «a stark, passionate closing argument in [her] broader case against the criminal justice system» by the NY Times, which named it as a Notable Book of the Year.

In November 2009, after the OFT beat the banks in the High Court and Court of Appeal, a shock technical ruling from the Supreme Court overturned this and kiboshed the OFT's hopes in the test case; soon after the OFT decided it wouldn't continue, even based on new argumentIn November 2009, after the OFT beat the banks in the High Court and Court of Appeal, a shock technical ruling from the Supreme Court overturned this and kiboshed the OFT's hopes in the test case; soon after the OFT decided it wouldn't continue, even based on new argumentin the High Court and Court of Appeal, a shock technical ruling from the Supreme Court overturned this and kiboshed the OFT's hopes in the test case; soon after the OFT decided it wouldn't continue, even based on new argumentin the test case; soon after the OFT decided it wouldn't continue, even based on new arguments.

Now, I'm gonna make an argument from that you don't necessarily want the best of the best after they've been doing it for 25, or in Seth Klarman's case, 33 years.

Especially as the competition between national schools of abstract painting escalated, breaking out in arguments and even punches in the case of Kline and the French painter Jean Fautrier, it would follow that the internal competition within these national schools also intensified.27 This was certainly true on the French side at the Venice Biennale: in a very unusual move, two artists — Fautrier and Hans Hartung — were awarded Grand Prizes in painting, whereas normally only one was given, because the jury could not decide between the two contenders.28 Within the context of the politics internal to the movement of abstract expressionism, Meryon could thus be seen as a reassertion of Kline's original, breakthrough style as his own and thus a defence of his personal artistic identity, after Kline himself had turned to colour, around 1955, and left it up for grabs.

The argument that after the extraordinary melt in 2007 any reduction in ice represents a cooling «trend» show how you think, and in any case I don't see, according to this post, that it is even true.

In the case of climate change, those measurements after measurements by thousands of scientists for over fifty years are adding up to an extremely compelling and robust argument because they all pretty much agree with each other: we can send people to the moon, and our excess CO2 is changing the climate.

The cases may well follow the pattern that played out after EPA's «endangerment» finding, motor vehicles rule, and new source review rules: More than 100 lawsuits were filed, but all were brought together for joint argument in court.

Mr. Coleman is proclaiming poorly researched opinion from apparently, or potentially politically motivated bias in arguments to discredit relevant, peer reviewed science that is becoming more irrefutable in case after case.

The oral arguments won't be heard until February 10th, so it will be after that date that we find out where this case could take e-waste recycling in the US.

In addition to the hearing schedules, docket information, party information, case summaries, webcasts of appeal hearings and factums on appeal, the Court will begin to post memorandums of argument on applications for leave to appeal after they are granted.

Liptak cites dictum from a 1993 decision, Herrera v. Collins, in which Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist wrote for the court,» [W] e may assume, for the sake of argument in deciding this case, that in a capital case a truly persuasive demonstration of «actual innocence» made after trial would render the execution of a defendant unconstitutional and warrant federal habeas relief.»

A few months after holding an hourlong oral argument, the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals agreed in late July to remand the case to the trial judge, U.S. District Judge Lawrence F. Stengel, who, in turn, agreed to vacate eight of his published opinions and to «direct» Lexis and Westlaw to remove them from their databases.

18 Unlike the extracurricular interscholastic competitions that bear the same name today, the moot courts of this period were mandatory exercises in the law school curriculum, modeled after the «moots» of the Inns of Courts in England.19 The law school professors of the day gave the students a fictitious case and assisted the students in drafting the pleadings and other documents, preparing the arguments, and then arguing the case.20 In theory, if not always in practice, these were the forerunners of today's legal writing classes that emphasize persuasive writinin the law school curriculum, modeled after the «moots» of the Inns of Courts in England.19 The law school professors of the day gave the students a fictitious case and assisted the students in drafting the pleadings and other documents, preparing the arguments, and then arguing the case.20 In theory, if not always in practice, these were the forerunners of today's legal writing classes that emphasize persuasive writinin England.19 The law school professors of the day gave the students a fictitious case and assisted the students in drafting the pleadings and other documents, preparing the arguments, and then arguing the case.20 In theory, if not always in practice, these were the forerunners of today's legal writing classes that emphasize persuasive writinin drafting the pleadings and other documents, preparing the arguments, and then arguing the case.20 In theory, if not always in practice, these were the forerunners of today's legal writing classes that emphasize persuasive writinIn theory, if not always in practice, these were the forerunners of today's legal writing classes that emphasize persuasive writinin practice, these were the forerunners of today's legal writing classes that emphasize persuasive writing.

The UK offers far more maternity leave than the European law minimum and the charity Working Families, intervening in the case, submitted that the policy arguments for a difference in pay might become less compelling several months after a child is born, a submission which met with the approval of the EAT.

After attending the en banc arguments in the Texas voter - ID case this past Tuesday, I got curious and decided to dig into rehearing practices at the Fifth Circuit.

But in the non-LiP case of Woodward and another v Phoenix Healthcare Distribution Ltd [2018] EWHC 334 (Ch) which came three weeks after Barton and in which Master Bowles considered the latter subsequent to oral argument, the defendant's solicitors» silence until the time for service had expired over not being instructed to accept service tipped the balance in favour of CPR 6.15 (2) validation.

That the Court is keen to avoid such a conclusion is clear from the argument brought forth in the statement of the Court in paragraphs 46 and 47 of the judgment, where the Court finds that its decision to rule for the non-applicability of the Visa Code does not run contrary to the distinct requirement of the Visa Code to refuse a visa in case there are doubts with regard to the applicant's intention to leave the territory of the Member State after the expiry of the visa — a refusal that would be taken as a result of the application of the Visa Code, not as a result of its non-applicability.

And Shepardizing and reading new cases and parts of the record after you realize the attorney may be taking the wrong approach in their argument.

After New Mex and the directors pleaded guilty to their respective charges, a sentencing hearing was held in which the Crown and defendants made separate arguments to support their view of the appropriate penalties in the case.

Thus, after rejecting the alleged infringement of art. 67 LRJCA by the judgment under appeal, the High Court to understand that it gave a succinct but substantial enough to arguments made in response instance, if it considers, however, an infringement of Art. 6.1 b) of Law 17/2001, of Trademarks, and the applicable case law.

Another interesting part of this case is the argument that Andrews raised that the injuries Berrones suffered happened in a fall that occurred a year after the accident.

In those cases, written argument is used, not in lieu of oral argument, but in addition to and usually as a precursor to oral argument.If a trial judge requires arguments to be made by written submissions, the trial judge must allow counsel, after written argument has been exchanged, to make oral arguments in the presence of the accused to supplement, correct, or otherwise amplify the written argumenIn those cases, written argument is used, not in lieu of oral argument, but in addition to and usually as a precursor to oral argument.If a trial judge requires arguments to be made by written submissions, the trial judge must allow counsel, after written argument has been exchanged, to make oral arguments in the presence of the accused to supplement, correct, or otherwise amplify the written argumenin lieu of oral argument, but in addition to and usually as a precursor to oral argument.If a trial judge requires arguments to be made by written submissions, the trial judge must allow counsel, after written argument has been exchanged, to make oral arguments in the presence of the accused to supplement, correct, or otherwise amplify the written argumenin addition to and usually as a precursor to oral argument.If a trial judge requires arguments to be made by written submissions, the trial judge must allow counsel, after written argument has been exchanged, to make oral arguments in the presence of the accused to supplement, correct, or otherwise amplify the written argumenin the presence of the accused to supplement, correct, or otherwise amplify the written argument.

«As you can imagine, after investing over two years litigating this case in the District Court and Court of Appeals, and almost the entirety of my fall semester preparing for three moot courts and oral argument, Monday was a pretty tough day.

In court she mouthed to the lawyer what argument to make and after her foolish unreasonable decision, I applied for her to rescind the decision and recuse herself from my case, she ordered the clerk to unfile my application and hurriedly signed a bogus order for the Attorney General lawyer

Comments from attorneys and litigants who've made this argument are most welcome Moore v. Moore, 300 S.C. 75, 386 S.E. 2d 456, 458 (1989) is the seminal South Carolina case on the factors the court should consider in determining whether to return a child to a parent after that child has lived with a non parent -LSB-...]

The strongest legal argument in favour of a ban on niqab's and burqa's would be on the basis of security (i.e. there is a legitimate state objective in preventing people from obscuring ones identity in public), but after the Gubaj Singh kirpan case I don't see that flying.

After all, the arguments made by the Sligo Weekender in this case were, on the basis of current law, correct.

You must serve and file a written argument within 30 days after receiving the appeal book and the appellant's factum or written argument unless the appeal is an expedited appeal in which case your time period for serving and filing a written argument is shortened to 15 days.

After two arguments at the Supreme Court, in the middle of which the matter was remanded for a hearing at the trial level, the Supreme Court accepted our position and rejected hypnotically refreshed testimony in any case in New Jersey.

Judge Alito, however, may be a different case, thanks in particular to the legal argument against Roe v. Wade he helped author after he wrote this initial memo.

As noted by Smith LJ, there is a «need for this issue to be authoritatively determined, after full argument, in a case in which it is properly raised» (at para 46).

Most highly - contested divorce cases settle before trial, after the parties have spent $ 20,000 to $ 40,000 in attorney fees, particularly if several months of argument takes place before a trial.