Sentences with phrase «after debating doing»

Not exact matches

In a Web video released the morning after the debate, Clinton's campaign juxtaposed Trump's comment at the debate that «I didn't say that at all» with the reality of a 2005 video which showed him declaring he can «grab» women «by the p — y» without asking.

So in 2015, after years of fiery debate, the Democrat - led FCC did just that.

You don't need to listen too closely to hear the pips squeaking in Western Australia's iron ore lemon after a week - long debate about the state's most important industry, which appears to be heading for a crisis that will hit companies and governments in equal measure.

The California state government is debating whether to regulate Bitcoin — and other digital currencies — after legally concluding that they have the authority to do...

Don't expect Adidas to walk away from West after just one week of bad press about a key «creator» whose cultural cachet sparks national debate.

The debate over what Congress and the president should do in response to mass shootings is once again confronting Washington after Nikolas Cruz, 19, allegedly killed 17 people at his former high school Wednesday, with authorities charging that he aimed his AR - 15 assault - style rifle and fired round after round into classroom after classroom in one of the nation's worst school shootings.

Shortly after BuzzFeed's story went live, Bosworth tweeted to say he doesn't agree with the post and that it was intended to create «debate about hard topics.»

The final reports, however, issued at the end of the Assembly after all the debates, did contain some clear affirmations, in great part due to Orthodox and evangelical efforts.

So some CNN reporter finds some crazed, frothing at the mouth ex-mormon who claims that this was done the DAY AFTER ROMNEY GIVES A STELLAR DEBATE PERFORMANCE AT PROBABLY THE MOST CRITICAL TIME OF HIS ELECTION CAMPAIGN???

What many do not realize in their appraisal of Oneness Pentecostalism is that it represents in many respects a return to the debates that ensued after the Council of Nicaea.

«He just doesn't get that aspect of theology because of the kind of church he grew up in,» my friend commented after a lively theology debate with a mutual friend.

Jeffes does not shy away from some of the most sensitive issues in this debate: abortion after rape, and when a disability is discovered.

And when at last, after a long debate and the prolonged cry of suffering man, God speaks, he does not explain or reply to Job.

There a plenty of non-trinitarian Christian denominations like the Christadelphians, Christian Scientists, Dawn Bible Students, Friends General Conference, Iglesia ni Cristo, Members Church of God International, Jehovah's Witnesses, Mormons, La Luz del Mundo, Living Church of God, Oneness Pentecostals, Unitarian Universalist Christians and the United Church of God... The very idea of the Trinity didn't become Christian dogma until some 300 years after Christ's death, and even then it was quite a debate at the Council of Nicea...

That said, I don't know about you, but I can always tell when the slick - sounding press releases are formulated after «the team» gets together for an exhaustive «public statement» strategy session during which every word, phrase, and nuance is carefully considered, debated - over, written and rewritten, and finally aligned - around prior to being released to the general public.

After stating that debates over fundamental theories do not resemble logical or mathematical proofs, Kuhn concludes:

After all, if all these smarter - than - me theologians, theorists, academics, scholars, thinkers, and leaders on both sides of the issue haven't been able to put the debate to rest, what chance does a slim yellow book by a happy - clappy Canadian mama - writer have?

After the «religious tests» debates, the most significant treatment of religion occurred in debates having to do with pluralism, «the multiplicity of sects,» republicanism and religious freedom.

The fact is that it does not matter the article here on the Belief Blog, the debates between some of the Faithful and some of the Atheist are and will be the same article after article.

I find it quite interesting in the current debate about waterboarding and «enhanced interrogation techniques» that many of the same people who are condemning the practice of waterboarding as a means to learn information about what our nation's enemies are planning, are the same people who, after 9 - 11, demanded to know why our nation's intelligence did not know that the 9 - 11 terrorist attack was coming.

«s internal debate over this sets up a fascinating conversation about the balance between personal ambition and responsibility to others that I don't believe a lot of parents will see coming after watching the film with their children.

Coco «s internal debate over this sets up a fascinating conversation about the balance between personal ambition and responsibility to others that I don't believe a lot of parents will see coming after watching the film with their children.

(One is reminded of a comment by Cardinal Ernesto Ruffini during a debate at Vatican II, when, after a number of speeches about the Holy Spirit, he responded, «We don't need the guardianship of the Holy Spirit; we have the hierarchy.»)

So to help clarify the debate, I thought it might help to share what I try to do when I evangelize... after all, this is what it is all about, right?

So anyway, maybe it is just normal in theological debate for everyone on all sides of an issue to think that the opponents «simply don't understand» (After all, if they understood, they would agree!).

To some extent, the debate is already over for Catholics as Amnesty sold the pass on sexuality years ago; the organisation already supports a right to contraception including the abortifacient morning - after pill, which it claims does not cause abortion, and affirms «sexual rights», a term which includes such gems as the right to a pleasurable sex life.

After debating for a few weeks what I should do with rhubarb (yes, it can survive in the fridge that long) I came to a conclusion that my kids won't appreciate either of grandma's signature drinks.

What they don't need to worry about is what to feed their kids after school to keep them powered through soccer practice or debate team or a night of trying to remember the difference between Chester A. Arthur and Rutherford B. Hayes (seriously, who were those guys??).

Many fans were left to engage in debate after Vardy's rejection, with some fans pleased the Gunners didn't sign him due to various reasons, whilst others were left frustrated.

Following their 3 - 0 win at West Ham on Sunday, some Southampton players might feel hard done by after being snubbed, but it looks as though the debate - provoking Crooks has got it spot on this time round.

It is understood that Giroud may be ready to return to the squad within the next week or so, however my main topic for debate is the fact that I don't think Giroud deserves to be placed back in the starting line up so soon after injury without proving himself, especially as Alexis Sanchez is doing so well.

I view Sir Keswick statement on the debate of Le Prof leaving Arsenal at the end of this season as a conditional statement to appease the Wenger Out Arsenal fans to be calm as the Arsenal board who for his prudent financial management skill in managing the club finances doesn't want him to go now to try to buy time for him to use Arsenal success of a win of the FA Cup and a 4th place table finish this season as a ploy to convince the Wenger Out Arsenal fans he can still be kept at the club as manager for another 2 — 3 years to achieve the titles they've been craving after in the next 2 — 3 season..

Should this even be a topic?Giroud is a player of average quality always surrounded by good players.I just don't get.It's as if only Arsenal fans rate him.This was a player who was bought to be the leading striker at Arsenal and after his years of failure which many deny he's now become a super sub?How laughable is that.From failure to super sub.If the so called world class striker we're signing goes out with an injury for about five months who comes in then.It seems to me people lack vision.Why is it always Giroud Giroud Giroud?After so many seasons people are still debating what souldn't even be debatable.I've lost count of the number of times he's been talked about here.This is the problem with our club.It's just not ruthless.This is a player who should have been gone long ago but due to him being French he still gets the chances.We won't miss him when he goes and I'd like to see if he'd stand out in a smaller club.

I don't necessarily disagree that MacKinnon could have a stronger case than Hall, but I think the real takeaway from the whole MVP debate is that awards are stupid and since the debates usually start right after the trade deadline any enjoyment people got from these debates died a month ago.

Holding did ok but Chambers was very cocky how many miss passes in dangerous areas did he miss place why didn't he booted the ball way down the field and take the pressure off at the first half the commentator spook of the inexperience of the defense and that liverpool did nt put enough pressure klopp rectified that straight away bang bang bang with runners and no protection while wenger face went all red with nothing to say the only thing that saved us really was the injuries for the game to take a change MR wenger is far to slow to fix things what is wrong with him he most not be in good health or something personnel worrying him cause after all he is the manager his got to have a fast thinking brain smell danger and act fast not seat and debate the issue with bold

First let me laugh hahahahaha.Secondly, let me give credit where it is due and say that that was a great finish from Giroud.Thirdly, do you know that if Giroud did not score today he would have been criticized very badly you know why because he does a lot of things wrongly when he does not score but when he scores everyone just ignores.How many people were actually focused on him after he scored you would realize that he breaks up a lot of attacks.Its a pity peeps are not being honest about him he is French and he is a very nice guy so i understand however.Lastly, it has been about 3 seasons or so that he has been here and people are still debating over him.Make up your mind i made mine up from day one that he arrived and realized he was awful however great classy goal.

After reading the JustArsenal comment sections for so long I don't think there's any cause for debate in him being best suited to a deeper role.

Holding did ok but Chambers was very cocky how many miss passes in dangerous areas did he miss place why didn't he booted the ball way down the field and take the pressure off at the first half the commentator spook of the inexperience of the defense and that liverpool did nt put enough pressure klopp rectified that straight away bang bang bang while wenger face went all red with nothing to say the only thing that saved us really was the injuries for the game to take a change MR is far to slow to fix things what is wrong with him he most not be in good health cause after all he is the manager his got to have a fast thinking brain smell danger and act fast not seat and debate the issue with bold

Interestingly enough, the hero of Kansas» 2008 national title, Mario Chalmers, did not publicly debate a decision of whether or not to leave KU after his sophomore year.

That doesn't mean that I will always get it 100 % right (I'm not perfect after all), but I will try to push the envelope and challenge the status quo.I do welcome you to challenge my opinion in the comments, but please expect a dialogue and a debate.

How often do I listen to the public debate about childcare — what is better for children, to be looked after by mum or by professional carers?

There's been a lot of debate about whether postpartum shapewear after a baby really works and you'll find many people claiming it doesn't.

After a lot of back and forth and debating about bringing the baby along or making it a family weekend getaway, we concluded that the logistics just didn't make sense and that our original strategy was best for the baby... even if it wasn't exactly best for me.

After listening to Senate Democratic Conference Leader John Sampson explain why bills like the Farm Workers Bill of Rights should be allowed to come to the floor for a debate and eventual vote even if it's clear they don't have sufficient support to pass — «This is about democracy!»

A flood of Google searches by people looking to give him even more money during and after last Thursday's Democratic debate... something Clinton most definitely did not see.

He offers to give the card to Davidson after the debate; he can «do what he likes with it», Horwood says.

The row comes after a protracted debate over the BBC's interview with actor Russell Brand, who he berated for never voting before himself admitting he did not vote in the 2010 election.

Speaking after the debate, the former Conservative MP said he did not regret making the remark.

The campaign did run some influence - the - discussion display ads, for instance buying space on the websites of major media outlets immediately after debates, but they focused more on the practical goal of list - building.

UFT president Michael Mulgrew issued a statement shortly after the rally ended, saying, «Mayoral control should not be a matter for debate, and doesn't need the UFT to defend it.»