Whatever may have been the actual course of events, historically speaking, which the New Testament means to signify when it speaks of the resurrection of Jesus Christ, it is at least clear that it was the conviction of the New Testament writers, building on the testimony of the disciples
after the crucifixion of Jesus — as it has been the continuing conviction of millions of Christian people since that time — that far from Jesus» being «put out of the way» by his death at the hands of the Roman authorities in Palestine, he was «let loose into the world.»
As the disciples and their friends lived through the first weeks and months
after the crucifixion of Jesus it is most unlikely that they abandoned the Bible, and if; from it, they sought illumination for their perplexity, then the methods of interpretation12 we have here briefly outlined throw some light on how they would have gone about it.
Pannenberg is one who perceived this very clearly: «
After the crucifixion of Jesus the question of the legitimacy of his mission was no longer open; on the contrary, until something else happened, it was negatively decided.»
Not exact matches
None
of the «four gospels were even written contemporary to Jesus» lifetime, the oldest being Mark, which was written 35 - 42 years
after Jesus supposed
crucifixion.
Don't tell me the story written at least 30 years
AFTER his death is your evidence... any records
of the trial,
crucifixion, birth records?
The stories
of Christian persecution were so popular that they spawned a market during the first centuries
after the
crucifixion.
The Book
of Acts can be seen as a continuation
of Luke since it is what he observed
of the Disciples - turned - Apostles
after Luke finishes reporting
of Jesus»
crucifixion and resurrection.
many
of the similarities between Jesus and the myths are mostly written (added)
AFTER Jesus... such as Attis being «crucified» there is much evidence to show that ATtis died originally from a spear on a hunting trp... and the crucifixion was added to the story after Christ... as we seen in writings of Greek historians etc. see this page to get more info http://www.tektonics.org/copycat/attis.php this is one of many studies out there to show the supposed similarities between Jesus and myths that debunk current opinions of those who say Christianity is a copycat of other
AFTER Jesus... such as Attis being «crucified» there is much evidence to show that ATtis died originally from a spear on a hunting trp... and the
crucifixion was added to the story
after Christ... as we seen in writings of Greek historians etc. see this page to get more info http://www.tektonics.org/copycat/attis.php this is one of many studies out there to show the supposed similarities between Jesus and myths that debunk current opinions of those who say Christianity is a copycat of other
after Christ... as we seen in writings
of Greek historians etc. see this page to get more info http://www.tektonics.org/copycat/attis.php this is one
of many studies out there to show the supposed similarities between Jesus and myths that debunk current opinions
of those who say Christianity is a copycat
of other myths
Re: «couple this proper translation
of Luke 24:21, with Mark's account stating the women purchase the spices
AFTER the Sabbath, and Luke's account stating they prepared the spices and ointments and THEN rest on the Sabbath in obedience to the command, the ONLY day possible for the
crucifixion was on Wednesday.»
The man was born
of a virgin, preached about being «born again» and had risen from the dead
after crucifixion, Freke says.
According to all the Gospels the resurrection took place early Sunday morning, the day
after the Sabbath and the third day
after the
crucifixion according to the ancient custom
of counting both the first and the last days.
The restoration
of the chamber that many believe to be the place where the body
of Jesus Christ was laid
after the
crucifixion is finally complete.
Also, creeds which speak
of Jesus, appeared as early as five years
after his
crucifixion.
Paul's new religion did not fit well with the Jewish beliefs held by the followers
of Jesus (led
after the
crucifixion by Jesus» brother James).
After the awful
crucifixion was over, none
of the Twelve even attended to Jesus» body.
Why did hundreds
of people see him walking around and talking
after the
crucifixion — oh, wait, is suppose you think the Romans were incompetent at killing?
In a study
of his earlier pictures, Kolker notes that «Scorsese is interested in the psychological manifestations
of individuals who are representative either
of a class or
of a certain ideological grouping; he is concerned with their relationship to each other or to an antagonistic environment... [and finally] there is no triumph for his characters» (A Cinema
of Loneliness [Oxford University Press, 19881, p. 162) The Jesus
of the Last Temptation fits this pattern (as do Travis Bickel in Taxi Driver, Jake LaMotta in Raging Bull and Paul Hackett in
After Hours) By eschewing any reference to a resurrection — and, in an interesting theological note, allowing Paul to suggest that his preaching
of the risen Christ is more important than the Jesus
of history — Scorsese presents the
crucifixion as the final willful act
of a man driven by a God who makes strange demands on his followers.
An evaluation
of the beliefs, ideas and speculations about Jesus
after the
crucifixion.
I'm certain the
crucifixion itself proves nothing — hundreds
of people were crucified,
after all, and none
of their deaths proved anything other than that people can come up with some really cruel ways to kill each other.
While this tradition is quite popular, it's more likely that December 25 was first selected because it was exactly 9 months
after March 25 — the day
of Jesus's
crucifixion.
The badly - in - need -
of - repair marble edicule that surrounded the tomb was stripped down to the limestone platform where the body
of Jesus was believed to have been laid
after his
crucifixion.
The same Song which helped to solve the stumbling block
of the
crucifixion also suggested the continuing role
of Jesus
after his death, as one who was «fully vindicated» in order that he might «vindicate many».
The two premises are that it was common knowledge to both Jew and Christian where the body
of Jesus had been buried, and that the resurrection
of Jesus was being publicly proclaimed in Jerusalem within a few days
after the
crucifixion.
One
of the disciples could say sadly
after his
crucifixion, «But we had hoped that he was the one to redeem Israel» (Luke 24:21).
Here the three disciples were given a pre-view
of the exaltation
of Jesus which was to eventuate
after his
crucifixion.
Many scholars have consequently interpreted it as a resurrection narrative which has been read back into the earthly life
of Jesus.34 Whether it stems from an actual experience
of the disciples, or whether it is a symbolic account
of the much more complex spiritual experience
of the disciples
after the
crucifixion, it is very difficult to determine.
Thus one who denies a priori that there was objective ground for the resurrection faith
of early Christianity denies in effect the whole Gospel portrait
of Jesus, for the knowledge
of the living Christ
after the
crucifixion is altogether continuous,
of a piece, with the memory
of the human Jesus.
Paul's effective knowledge
of Jesus came to him only
after Jesus»
crucifixion, by way
of the testimony
of others.
It is easy to mark the point at which the Christian message came into being, and that is the moment at which certain
of Jesus» followers claimed to have seen him alive again
after his death by
crucifixion.
And as for Roman texts, there are several texts that are secular that mention Jesus, but most
of them were not written until
after Jesus»
crucifixion.
Dr. Robert W. Funk, New Testament scholar and organizer
of the Jesus Seminar, points out that all four New Testament gospels were written forty years or more
after Jesus»
crucifixion, and though church tradition says that the disciples Matthew and John both wrote gospels, Bible scholars for more than a century have believed that none
of the gospel writers actually knew Jesus during his lifetime.
However,
after the sacrifice from the
crucifixion, these original 613 laws were in a sense altered because
of Christ's blood.
Also, the Lord's Prayer probably was not composed by Jesus at all, but was more likely the work
of early Christians who wrote it
after the
crucifixion.
Applying the same logic... the 500 witnesses, the change in culture
of the region in the time
after the
crucifixion, josephus, talmud...
Transition to this kind
of gathering
after long practice
of the rank and file ordering
of discipleship will entail continuation
of the
crucifixion of self that launched entrance to life in the Spirit.
Beneath layers
of ancient marble, renovators at the Church
of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem say they have found what may be the limestone bench where the body
of Jesus was laid
after his
crucifixion.
Researchers in Jerusalem may soon be one step closer to understanding more about a stone slab that the body
of Jesus may have been laid on
after the
crucifixion.
Christ was raised from the dead and seated at the right hand
of God only
after undergoing the pain
of rejection, condemnation, and
crucifixion.
The fact is, that we have no more evidence that John wrote the Gospel
of John than we do that Peter wrote the Gospel
of Peter, other than Irenaeus» declaration in 180 AD, in France, one hundred and fifty years
after the
crucifixion, that the four gospels we have today were written by the persons that he asserts, based upon evidence, that he never gives!
Jesus, saying that he would base his church on Peter's faith, knew that Peter would deny him and many
of the apostles would flee in fear
after the
crucifixion.
More probably Jesus told the story
of the landlord and the tenants, but the part about the son was added
after the
crucifixion.
Three days
after His death by
crucifixion, that tomb was found to be empty by a group
of His women followers 3.
We will consider this hypothesis again below and examine whether it satisfies the criteria that we set out at the beginning, in particular the need to explain the turnabout
of Jesus» disciples
after the
crucifixion and the content
of their message.
In conclusion, then, while there may have been some early Christologies that interpreted the Easter experience as «exaltation» instead
of «resurrection», this would not be a surprising response to «appearances»
of Jesus
after the
crucifixion, and so does not address the nature or the probability
of these appearances nor the question
of whether the exaltation interpretation somehow evolved separately from the appearance traditions.
Since there was no universal expectation
of an immediate resurrection, it would not be at all surprising if an experience
of Jesus» presence
after the
crucifixion were interpreted in some cases as an «exaltation» instead.
Is the whole point
of the resurrection to prove that Jesus was right
after all, that the
crucifixion was more than a murder
after all?
The gospels were written at least 40 years
after the time that the
crucifixion is assumed to have taken place, as well as
after the destruction
of Jerusalem in the The Fiirst Jewish Revolt.
The resurrection is the presupposition
of the cross, as Jürgen Moltmann has recently reminded us.3 Without the resurrection, Jesus» execution is no different from the
crucifixion of countless Christian martyrs
after him, or the stoning
of the prophets before him.
The herbs are best known through the story
of the Three Wise Men (Magi) delivering gold, frankincense, and myrrh for the baby Jesus; myrrh was also used to anoint Jesus» body
after the
crucifixion.
Update:
After reading our original article on the Shroud
of Turin and its carbon dating, a USA college student writing a thesis on the subject asked us a The Shroud
of Turin, a linen cloth that tradition associates with the
crucifixion and burial
of Jesus, has undergone numerous scientific tests, the most